Moriarty's Darren Aronofsky Interview!!

All the dirt. All the top secret stuff. Anything that has to do with the process of getting us to sit and watch something projected on the big screen.

Moriarty's Darren Aronofsky Interview!!

Postby Moriarty on Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:36 am

User avatar
Moriarty
BOMB IN RIBCAGE
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:18 am
Location: Somewhere underneath Hollywood Blvd.

Postby John-Locke on Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:38 am

Sweet, Thanks Drewp.

I'll read that now.
Image
User avatar
John-Locke
BULLETPROOF TIGER
 
Posts: 12365
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 7:49 am
Location: Unknown

Postby TonyWilson on Tue Nov 08, 2005 10:46 am

Cool interview Mori, nice to see Aronofsky a big geek too. I just hope the studio don't fuck with him too much about the release and marketing. They let him in on cutting the teaser though, that's really promising.

And yes I'm sure the Fountain is going to be mindblowing I read a script review (or treatment review?) on AICN aaaaaages ago.
Elitism is positing that your taste is equivalent to quality, you hate "Hamlet" does it make it "bad"? If you think so, you're one elite motherfucker.
User avatar
TonyWilson
No Less Liquid Than His Shadow
 
Posts: 9155
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:45 am
Location: A Drained Swimming Pool

Postby ThisIsTheGirl on Tue Nov 08, 2005 10:53 am

Yep - this is one of those movies that I feel certain I'm gonna love even before I've seen it

I don't think I've ever been wrong when I've had that feeling, the effects alone sound superb, I'm really looking forward to a new sci-fi film that doesn't rely entirely on CGI for its "wow" moments
User avatar
ThisIsTheGirl
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5689
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:42 am
Location: London, England

Postby John-Locke on Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:10 am

I'm expecting The Fountain to get tons of Critical Aclaim & I'm sure a lot of people will love it, however I also get the feeling that a lot of people are too lazy to enjoy a film like this, they don't want to have to think too much & they will label the film as crap. Still I think Warners are savy enough to realise that even if it only makes it's money back on cinematic & initial DVD release, over the decades a well made film will make them a lot more money, like their Kubrick, Burton & Eastwood films.
Image
User avatar
John-Locke
BULLETPROOF TIGER
 
Posts: 12365
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 7:49 am
Location: Unknown

Postby Pacino86845 on Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:25 am

Nicely put, JL.
User avatar
Pacino86845
EGYPTIAN LOVER
 
Posts: 14064
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:20 am

Postby Moriarty on Tue Nov 08, 2005 6:50 pm

And that's exactly how they see him, JL... the new Kubrick. Don Buckley, the WB publicity guy we mentioned in the article, worked for Kubrick starting with CLOCKWORK ORANGE, and he's the one who made the comparison between SK and DA. They just plain want to make Aronofsky films. Cool, huh?
User avatar
Moriarty
BOMB IN RIBCAGE
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:18 am
Location: Somewhere underneath Hollywood Blvd.

Postby TonyWilson on Tue Nov 08, 2005 6:52 pm

Moriarty wrote:And that's exactly how they see him, JL... the new Kubrick. Don Buckley, the WB publicity guy we mentioned in the article, worked for Kubrick starting with CLOCKWORK ORANGE, and he's the one who made the comparison between SK and DA. They just plain want to make Aronofsky films. Cool, huh?



Oh man that is fanfuckingtastic. Wo0t Wo0t! :D
Elitism is positing that your taste is equivalent to quality, you hate "Hamlet" does it make it "bad"? If you think so, you're one elite motherfucker.
User avatar
TonyWilson
No Less Liquid Than His Shadow
 
Posts: 9155
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:45 am
Location: A Drained Swimming Pool


Return to Movie News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron