What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Betamax and beyond

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby stereosforgeeks on Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:29 pm

TheBaxter wrote:DON'T DO IT! if people keep paying $10 for VOD movies, companies will keep charging $10 for VOD movies. if you don't want them charging that much, vote with your wallets. there's no way in hell i'd pay $10 to watch a movie ONCE, on my own equipment, when i can wait til it comes on DVD/blu-ray at netflix and see it for the equivalent of 2 or 3 bucks. i don't like paying $10 for a movie ticket either, but at least then you get a big-ass screen and sound system.


You watch it for 24 hours haha. I watched in HD. For a movie that wont come to the theaters in the area it is a valid option if you dont want to wait.
User avatar
stereosforgeeks
Re-Wound
 
Posts: 7380
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: DCish

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby caruso_stalker217 on Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:02 am

I've been on a major Bond kick lately. Six films in five days. Considering I thought I hated the shit out of the fucking Bond pictures (aside from the Daniel Craig adventures) I'd say that's a lot or something. Something significant. Just bought GOLDFINGER and LICENSE TO KILL today. Probably watch those motherfuckers soon.
Image
User avatar
caruso_stalker217
TOO AGED FOR THIS MALARKEY
 
Posts: 4840
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: Oregon, US of A

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Lord Voldemoo on Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:32 am

Strangely, for a big horror fan, I saw Rob Zombie's The Devil's Rejects for the first time tonight.

I thought House of a 1000 corpses was okay. The Halloween remake was shit. I'm not inherently a big Rob Zombie fan, but I really enjoyed this movie. I loved the way it toyed with your emotions. Root for this guy, root for these guys, no wait, root for the "bad guys", etc. It had just enough "holy shit that's fucked up" moments balanced with some truly humorous moments.

Most importantly, it's exceedingly rare for me to not know in advance how a horror movie will end. I had no idea how this movie would end.

Zombie borrows alot from his predecessors. Last House on the Left. I Spit on Your Grave. Texas Chainsaw. Hell, even Nightmare on Elm Street and Halloween, and...most strangely, a bit of SPOILERS Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.... But, where in House of 1000 Corpses it felt like a rip off, with Devil's Rejects it felt like homage to me. Though I will admit I don't fully understand where I draw that line. It's totally subjective.

Anyway, there's my review like 4 years late. I really had a lot of fun with this movie. If you have seen a couple of Zombie films and wrote him off, as I did, go check this out. It may not change your mind....but it got me thinking.

7/10
Image
User avatar
Lord Voldemoo
He Who Shall Not Be Milked
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 12:18 pm
Location: Pasture next to the Red Barn

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby magicmonkey on Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:59 am

Lord Voldemoo wrote:Strangely, for a big horror fan, I saw Rob Zombie's The Devil's Rejects for the first time tonight.

I thought House of a 1000 corpses was okay. The Halloween remake was shit. I'm not inherently a big Rob Zombie fan, but I really enjoyed this movie. I loved the way it toyed with your emotions. Root for this guy, root for these guys, no wait, root for the "bad guys", etc. It had just enough "holy shit that's fucked up" moments balanced with some truly humorous moments.

Most importantly, it's exceedingly rare for me to not know in advance how a horror movie will end. I had no idea how this movie would end.

Zombie borrows alot from his predecessors. Last House on the Left. I Spit on Your Grave. Texas Chainsaw. Hell, even Nightmare on Elm Street and Halloween, and...most strangely, a bit of SPOILERS Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.... But, where in House of 1000 Corpses it felt like a rip off, with Devil's Rejects it felt like homage to me. Though I will admit I don't fully understand where I draw that line. It's totally subjective.

Anyway, there's my review like 4 years late. I really had a lot of fun with this movie. If you have seen a couple of Zombie films and wrote him off, as I did, go check this out. It may not change your mind....but it got me thinking.

7/10


Yeah, I enjoyed that movie of his too, and, lucky me, I haven't seen any of his other monstrosities! It was a real 70's feeling genre piece.
User avatar
magicmonkey
The laser gun carrying milkyway master
 
Posts: 5059
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:26 am
Location: Shanghizzo

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby caruso_stalker217 on Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:56 am

I thought HOUSES OF 1000 CORPSES was a horrendous pile of shit, but was pleasantly surprised by THE DEVIL'S REJECTS.

I am also one of the seven people who likes Zombie's HALLOWEEN.
Image
User avatar
caruso_stalker217
TOO AGED FOR THIS MALARKEY
 
Posts: 4840
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: Oregon, US of A

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby DerLanghaarige on Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:48 am

Without planning it, I had a dumb action weekend.

First Punisher: Warzone, which I kinda enjoyed, without really caring for it. I loved the visual style, with all the colourful neon lights EVERYWHERE (even in a church!) and the well shot action scenes. But I didn't really care for anything. The violence came along like nobody knew if they wanted to play it for laughs or for shocks, the actors were so-so (Doug Hutchison was fun, but sometimes he was even sillier and more annoying than Heath Ledger in TDK), the story with the family of the dead FBI agent was lame and apart from some creative kills, there was not one single piece of originality in there (The most original part was maybe how Castle solved the old "Decide which one of your friends should die" question. I liked that!).

Then i caught on TV Street Fighter, with Jean-Claude. I remember how I watched it 10 years ago and hated the shit out of it, but for any reason now I felt very entertained! I'm not saying it's a good movie, but it's definitely better than the piece of shit that came out this year. Not just because of Raul Julia, who seemed to be the only one who knew that he was in a b-movie and therefore didn't even try to play it for critics. I would even go so far and say that he might have died afterwards, because he had too much fun! Oh yeah, fun, I even laughed at all the silly jokes in the movie! Especially about the totally random Godzilla joke! And holy shit, it had Kylie Minogue firing a bazooka!

And finally I watched Crank: High Voltage. Y'know, I'm a huge fan of the first Crank. It's an insane and immoral fun movie and don't even tries to be more. I even approve on the hyperactive visual style, just because it fits the whole concept of the movie. And while I appreciate that they turned the insanity and immorality to 11 in the sequel, I didn't care for almost anything I saw. Everything just felt too forced. Part 1 felt like Neveldine/Taylor sat down and thought something like: "Hey, wouldn't it be cool if..." and then just made a movie out of whatever they came up with. But for part 2 they seemed to go: "NO, NO, NO, this is NOT CRAZY enough! We MUST come up with something crazier. We MUST! WE MUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUST!" It's still a watchable movie for fans of the first part, but I think I will watch part 1 more often than part 2.
Image
User avatar
DerLanghaarige
Lohman's Wet Shirt
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby DennisMM on Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:21 pm

It's been a scattershot few weeks for DVDs, for me. I continue to bypass the great stuff I brought home from the library (King Kong '33, Manchurian Candidate '62, Yankee Doodle Dandy, Apocalypse Now Complete Dossier) in favor of my Netflix queue, which has proven itself quite mediocre of late. Perhaps I'm favoring Netflix because I'm paying for it, whereas I can keep renewing the library DVDs for months if I like.

For Your Consideration: This is a comedy from Christopher Guest and Eugene Levy, written very much in the style of their mockumentaries like Best in Show. Unfortunately, it's presented as a straight comedy, so some of the best bits that would play well in a mocku don't come across as well. The writing is mostly good, though the premise is awfully weak. Catherine O'Hara is good, as always, and Harry Shearer gives a nice performance as a veteran actor trapped in desperation and depression as he watches his career sink below the waves. 7/10

C.S.A. - Confederate States of America is a mocku based on the premise that, with French and British backing, the Confederacy won the Civil War and annexed the U.S.A. to create a new nation in which slavery remains legal 140 years later. It's presented as a British documentary airing on C.S. television for the first time, complete with commercials for products and services available in the setting. To maintain the appearance of reality, this features no actors the typical viewer is likely to recognize, but as in some similar films there are actors almost familiar to the eye, which lends a soupcon of verisimilitude - I remember the TV mocku Special Bulletin used the technique well. The last twenty minutes or so are overwrought, but to that point it's an entertaining view even if it's wrapped up in a big, smug bow courtesy of executive producer Spike Lee. That bow is pulled even tighter with the credits, when we learn more about the fake ads seen throughout. 6/10 for amateurism

American Dreamz is pretty dreadful, but it has several strong performances. Hugh Grant is fine as a Simon Cowell figure, though I find it difficult to believe Cowell is one-half as human as Grant's character. Dennis Quaid presents a cartoonish president obviously based on W, and though his performance is over the top I can believe that he's just channeling Bush on a bad day that happens to last for months - much like Bush's actual bad days. Willem Dafoe is also very entertaining as a composite of Dick Cheney and Karl Rove, made to look very much like the former and act like the latter. You can almost see his hand sliding into the back of Quaid's jacket to make the mouth and eyes work. 5/10 but with some solid moments.

The Time Machine from 2002. I'd seen rough comments on this, but I enjoy Guy Pearce enough that I risked the Netflix rental. Dear gods, is it impossible for anyone but George Pal to make a decent film or TV adaptation of Wells's novella? For some reason, the Time Traveler is Americanized, though they hired a Brit to fill the role. Rather than make his researches purely a matter of curiosity they have to give him a tragic backstory to spur his creation of the machine. The requisite action sequences are added, as are touches completely unnecessary. The Eloi once again speak English, this time because it is a "stone tongue" taught to children out of tradition. We're given a telepathic "uber-Morlock" and poor digital Morlocks who leap about like wild cats or wolves, plus dreadful animatronic makeup on the Morlocks when they are not leaping about. Most irritating to me, when the Traveler journeys many millions of years into the future he finds the Morlocks STILL ruling the world and so goes back in time to save the day. There is no gentle, sad view of the far future earth without man, as seen in the book. Pearce is good enough, though he looks oddly simian at times. The actors portraying the Eloi are only mildly irritating. Jeremy Irons as the master Morlock made me wonder why he doesn't have enough money yet to avoid this sort of thing. Still, it's handsomely produced, so it picks up a point for looking good. 6/10

Next in the queue: The Weather Man. I love me some Nic Cage, good or bad.
User avatar
DennisMM
It's a strange world
 
Posts: 13700
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Not in Massachusetts

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby caruso_stalker217 on Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:39 pm

THE WEATHER MAN is good shit. Any movie where Michael Caine says "dildo" is worth watching.
Image
User avatar
caruso_stalker217
TOO AGED FOR THIS MALARKEY
 
Posts: 4840
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: Oregon, US of A

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Spandau Belly on Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:15 am

DerLanghaarige wrote:Then i caught on TV Street Fighter, with Jean-Claude. Not just because of Raul Julia, who seemed to be the only one who knew that he was in a b-movie and therefore didn't even try to play it for critics. I would even go so far and say that he might have died afterwards, because he had too much fun!


Raul Julia is awesome in this movie. I really like the lines he says at the end when he's flying around electrocuting Van Damme and trying to convince Van Damme he is God and then kinda gives up and says something like "Oh whatever, you can keep your God, but I'm still going to beat you up!"
Image
User avatar
Spandau Belly
self-fellating peacock
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:15 am
Location: Ontario

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby travis-dane on Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:14 am

OF COURSE!
-
Image
User avatar
travis-dane
100% OLEG!
 
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:19 am
Location: DTVille

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Spandau Belly on Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:04 pm

"If you don't love Brian Trenchard-Smith then get the fuck out of here!"
Quentin Tarantino as quoted on the packaging for:

STUNT ROCK

Okay Quinty, I am currently getting the fuck out of here.

Honestly, movies with Quinty recommendations on the packaging are pretty hit and miss, but after having a very pleseant experience with SWITCHBLADE SISTERS, my faith in the guy's picks was getting stronger. The packaging for this film is not necissarily deceptive, it's just that I imagined a way better movie based on it. They talk about all this combining of rock 'n roll and stunts and I kinda envisaged something like STREETS OF FIRE, but with John Woo level carnage. Maybe something about a transporter guy who has replaced the steering wheel of his car with a drum set so that he can steer his car through rhythym or something absurd.

What we get is more of a faked documentary type picture about the life a stuntman in Los Angeles and the life of a cheesy metal band who dress up like wizards and do magic tricks while playing their music on stage. The two are connected because the stuntman is the cousin of one of the guys in the band and they ultimately team up and the stuntman performs a stunt during one of their concerts.

Almost everybody in this uses their real stage names and so it functions like a promotional music movie like HARD DAY'S NIGHT, only for a band that was not really to my tastes. That being said, HARD DAY'S NIGHT might've benefited from Ringo flying threw a windshield on fire. This band is called Sorcery, and fate is indeed a cruel wizard. I wish I had rented porn or a magic video that shows me my own death or something. If you have heard of this band and actually like them, then you've probably also heard of this movie, so I am all out of people to whom I can recommend this film. There were some good stunts and I laughed a bit at the cheesy acting, the magic part of the stage show might've been entertaining if I had actually been there, but the music really didn't do anything for me and it's the bulk of the film. This isn't the worst thing I've ever seen, and it is somewhat distinct, but I don't feel like a better man for having watched it and I am now scared about meeting individuals who love this and I will know what they are talking about but wish that I did not.
Image
User avatar
Spandau Belly
self-fellating peacock
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:15 am
Location: Ontario

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby magicmonkey on Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:44 pm

Spandau Belly wrote:"If you don't love Brian Trenchard-Smith then get the fuck out of here!"
Quentin Tarantino as quoted on the packaging for:

STUNT ROCK

Okay Quinty, I am currently getting the fuck out of here.

Honestly, movies with Quinty recommendations on the packaging are pretty hit and miss, but after having a very pleseant experience with SWITCHBLADE SISTERS, my faith in the guy's picks was getting stronger. The packaging for this film is not necissarily deceptive, it's just that I imagined a way better movie based on it. They talk about all this combining of rock 'n roll and stunts and I kinda envisaged something like STREETS OF FIRE, but with John Woo level carnage. Maybe something about a transporter guy who has replaced the steering wheel of his car with a drum set so that he can steer his car through rhythym or something absurd.

What we get is more of a faked documentary type picture about the life a stuntman in Los Angeles and the life of a cheesy metal band who dress up like wizards and do magic tricks while playing their music on stage. The two are connected because the stuntman is the cousin of one of the guys in the band and they ultimately team up and the stuntman performs a stunt during one of their concerts.

Almost everybody in this uses their real stage names and so it functions like a promotional music movie like HARD DAY'S NIGHT, only for a band that was not really to my tastes. That being said, HARD DAY'S NIGHT might've benefited from Ringo flying threw a windshield on fire. This band is called Sorcery, and fate is indeed a cruel wizard. I wish I had rented porn or a magic video that shows me my own death or something. If you have heard of this band and actually like them, then you've probably also heard of this movie, so I am all out of people to whom I can recommend this film. There were some good stunts and I laughed a bit at the cheesy acting, the magic part of the stage show might've been entertaining if I had actually been there, but the music really didn't do anything for me and it's the bulk of the film. This isn't the worst thing I've ever seen, and it is somewhat distinct, but I don't feel like a better man for having watched it and I am now scared about meeting individuals who love this and I will know what they are talking about but wish that I did not.


I've not seen "Stunt Rock" or "Turkey Shoot" yet, but I have seen "BMX Bandits", "Our Man in Hong Kong" (with Jimmy Wang Yu - the one-armed boxer), "Death Cheaters" and "Dead-End Drive-in". I thought they were all great fun movies, and I never knew Stunt Rock was a Brian Trenchard Smith film! These movies have none of the music but they (OMiHK and Death Cheaters) are brim packed with action,stunts, fights, ridiculously cool set pieces ( OMiHK has an action scene on Ayers Rock!) and cheesy humour that even extends to the clever jokey editing.
User avatar
magicmonkey
The laser gun carrying milkyway master
 
Posts: 5059
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:26 am
Location: Shanghizzo

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Spandau Belly on Thu Oct 22, 2009 6:08 am

Maybe those other movies would be more to my tastes. I like action and stuntwork and was just hoping for a cheesy action movie written around the stunts like a Jackie Chan picture or something. All the stunts in this were pretty good, it was just that there wasn't an a cheesy action story around them. It was just a "celebrity stuntman" talking about his trade and then performing a stunt.

BMX Bandits does intrigue me. I'm not going to write this director off completely, he tried to do something kinda different here, and it's quite possible and even likely that Quentin Tarantino wasn't specifically talking about this film when he said that he loves Brian Trenchard-Smith.

If I can find any of those other movies I will probably give them a shot. Thanks bud.
Image
User avatar
Spandau Belly
self-fellating peacock
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:15 am
Location: Ontario

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby tapehead on Thu Oct 22, 2009 4:00 pm

magicmonkey wrote:
Spandau Belly wrote:"If you don't love Brian Trenchard-Smith then get the fuck out of here!"
Quentin Tarantino as quoted on the packaging for:

STUNT ROCK

Okay Quinty, I am currently getting the fuck out of here.

Honestly, movies with Quinty recommendations on the packaging are pretty hit and miss, but after having a very pleseant experience with SWITCHBLADE SISTERS, my faith in the guy's picks was getting stronger. The packaging for this film is not necissarily deceptive, it's just that I imagined a way better movie based on it. They talk about all this combining of rock 'n roll and stunts and I kinda envisaged something like STREETS OF FIRE, but with John Woo level carnage. Maybe something about a transporter guy who has replaced the steering wheel of his car with a drum set so that he can steer his car through rhythym or something absurd.

What we get is more of a faked documentary type picture about the life a stuntman in Los Angeles and the life of a cheesy metal band who dress up like wizards and do magic tricks while playing their music on stage. The two are connected because the stuntman is the cousin of one of the guys in the band and they ultimately team up and the stuntman performs a stunt during one of their concerts.

Almost everybody in this uses their real stage names and so it functions like a promotional music movie like HARD DAY'S NIGHT, only for a band that was not really to my tastes. That being said, HARD DAY'S NIGHT might've benefited from Ringo flying threw a windshield on fire. This band is called Sorcery, and fate is indeed a cruel wizard. I wish I had rented porn or a magic video that shows me my own death or something. If you have heard of this band and actually like them, then you've probably also heard of this movie, so I am all out of people to whom I can recommend this film. There were some good stunts and I laughed a bit at the cheesy acting, the magic part of the stage show might've been entertaining if I had actually been there, but the music really didn't do anything for me and it's the bulk of the film. This isn't the worst thing I've ever seen, and it is somewhat distinct, but I don't feel like a better man for having watched it and I am now scared about meeting individuals who love this and I will know what they are talking about but wish that I did not.


I've not seen "Stunt Rock" or "Turkey Shoot" yet, but I have seen "BMX Bandits", "Our Man in Hong Kong" (with Jimmy Wang Yu - the one-armed boxer), "Death Cheaters" and "Dead-End Drive-in". I thought they were all great fun movies, and I never knew Stunt Rock was a Brian Trenchard Smith film! These movies have none of the music but they (OMiHK and Death Cheaters) are brim packed with action,stunts, fights, ridiculously cool set pieces ( OMiHK has an action scene on Ayers Rock!) and cheesy humour that even extends to the clever jokey editing.


The QT quote is lifted from 'Not Quite Hollywood', a really good review of Australian 70's cinema or 'Oz-ploitation'; I've seen Turkey shoot - it's expoitative, and daringly tasteless; almost sure to get some OLEG love at some point. BMX Bandits is like a biker movie for 12-year olds starring a pre pubescent Nicole Kidman and featuring stunts no sane parent would permit their kid actor to be involved in. Trenchard-Smith is necessary viewing for any kid who grew up in Australia in the 80's/90's who liked cheap thrills and violence onscreen, but it's almost a shame he has gotten so much play from the Doco, as imo other guys like Richard Franklin (RIP!), Phillipe Moira and slightly more well known guys like Russel Mulcahy and Simon Wincer (watch Snapshot) deserve more attention.
It's stunning how much QT seems to know about this period of Australian film-making, but so cool that people in other countries are discovering these movies (due to DVD releases abroad) as a result of Mark Hartley's film.
User avatar
tapehead
BALLS!!!
 
Posts: 9098
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:13 pm
Location: OZ

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Ribbons on Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:07 pm

Wicker Park

The truth will set you free. Sort of.

I apologize. I watched this movie something like a month ago and am only now getting around to writing a review. A lot of my immediate reactions have become vague and confused as a result. Still, it'd be a shame not to make some attempt at a write-up, because I felt so strongly about what I saw.

Wicker Park is a romantic movie. It's incredibly cynical about human relationships, as most romantics are, but still hopeful and giddy with the transcendent power of love. Whether or not it earns that "thesis" the way it tries to is questionable, but at no point does the sentiment of... loving being in love ever feel disingenuous. The movie itself is another matter.

It's a remake of the French film L'Appartement. How much it owes to its predecessor I can't say. It claims to be "shot on-location in Quebec and Chicago," which confuses me, since as far as I can tell the entire story takes place in one city ( :? ), which I believe is Chicago -- though maybe I missed something. Arrgh, not off to a good start with the trying to work through the muddled impressions thing, am I?

Anywhat, Josh Hartnett plays Matthew, a young go-getter in the corporate world. He has a fiancée, a promising job, and a relatively easy existence; a vague set of ambitions, working towards that perfect "moment," perhaps, that is the culmination of all his work. Then, one day, while in a video store, he sees her: a dancer named Lisa, played by Diane Kruger. And he abandons all of that. He's instantly smitten. There's something about her that immediately fills up his entire world, that pulls it into hers and makes him revolve around her. He has to see her, he has to know her. Being connected to her, in some way, makes his own life seem better. And so, when she should drop into a friend's (Luke, played by Matthew Lillard) shoe store in order to browse, he does something desperate: he undertakes an act of deception (which, by the way, is a Big Theme in this movie). Asking his friend for this favor, Hartnett pretends to be an employee at the shoe store in order to get his flirt on with the pretty girl. And it pays off: soon they're in the middle of a passionate relationship -- despite the aforementioned spoken-for-ness that Hartnett's character's got going on. It's foolish and maybe even a little irresponsible, but that's how badly Matthew wants to be with her. And then, one day, Lisa suddenly goes missing -- no warning sign, no heads-up, minimal clues -- and he does even more desperate things in order to find her again. It is at this point in the film that Alex (Rose Byrne) walks into his life.

Although Josh Hartnett toplined all of its promotional materials, and although he and Diane Kruger got the lion's share of the previews, Wicker Park is, in my opinion, Rose Byrne's film. She plays Alex, and she is in this movie just as much, if not more, than Josh Hartnett. What's more, her character is far more dynamic. Alex is a lonely, somewhat-depressive actress who's currently landed a supporting role in a theatre production of one of Shakespeare's plays (don't remember which one, sorry :oops: ). She lives in l'appartement with Lisa, but runs into Josh Hartnett by happenstance on the street. And... she's smitten (sounds familiar, doesn't it?). It's like a crush, really: she's infatuated with him and, in her lonely way, thinks that loving him validates her. So she begins a stalker-ship with him, sort of, watching him from afar. At first, anyway. At the same time, she begins dating his friend Luke. I haven't been able to figure out whether she had ulterior motives with Luke from the outset or whether it was just a coincidence that he was the other guy's best bro, but in any case, her relationship with the shoe guy helps her get closer to Matthew. She then proceeds to engage in a little deception of her own, manipulating Lisa's disappearance (it's entirely tame, no salacious kidnappings or anything of the sort) and taking up residence in her apartment. She assumes (correctly) that Matthew will go looking for Lisa, and when he does he'll find her instead. They develop a quasi-relationship that neither is entirely comfortable with, but that Alex tries desperately to maintain, frantically juggling relationships with the other three leads in order to keep them together. Her tangled web eventually falls apart at a climactic restaurant scene, and Alex is forced to reveal the truth to her real boyfriend and her imaginary one. And, of course, Matthew and Lisa are re-united at the end -- though he does have to ditch that pesky fiancée first (I know that sounds kind of glib considering, but it is one of the areas of the film that I had a problem with, which I'll get to later).

What fascinates me about the movie is how it handles the concept of love. This is what I think it posits: Matthew and Alex are both in love with other characters. And you can almost feel that rush of love that they feel. It completes them. It makes them feel better. But it is a selfish love. And an idealized love, at that; they enhance the attractive qualities of their objects of infatuation ...and of themselves in the process (because they are in love with perfection, as they see it). When they have the chance to get closer to their respective crushes, they lie about themselves to so, glossing ovoer whatever personal attributes they find unattractive so that they may become deserving in their own eyes of that grand, perfect "moment," that feeling of love. Of course, they both lie to and arguably mistreat their would-be paramours throughout.

That aforementioned restaurant scene where all the cards are laid out on the table climaxes with this line:

"You know... sometimes, when you see something from afar, you develop a fantasy about it. But then, when you see it up close, 9 times out of 10, you wish you hadn't."

Which is the twistiest point of the movie. Josh Hartnett's character utters that line, but is he talking about people who deceive you, or people who you idealize? And, as he says it to Alex, who's no more culpable than he is, who exactly is he referring to, and for what reason? It's complicated stuff. Or it was for me, at least, but part of that could be because I relate to the character of Alex more than I do the character of Matthew. But maybe what it is, is that he's trying to tell Alex that he's not the perfect guy she seems to think he is, and that deceiving herself into believing otherwise is unhealthy. And maybe this brings him to the realization that he's been doing the exact same thing.

The message of the movie seems to be: be truthful. It may not be the easiest way to enter a relationship, but it's the easiest way to enter the right one. Everyone has flaws, but that doesn't mean they're undeserving of love. It can be a beautiful thing. But maybe you be okay with yourself first.

From that point on, Alex and Matthew both are forced to admit the things that they said and did in the process of deceiving other people. In Alex's case, she's forced to re-visit her own insecurities about being alone.

In Josh Hartnett's case, he gets the girl (the 1 time out of 10?). I don't mind this in theory, because the supposition (I'm supposing) is that honest relationships can be developed, but it seemed rather convenient, and I don't think his character experienced the same kind of individual growth that Alex's character had to. Basically, Alex tells him where Lisa is, he goes to find her, tells his (soon-to-be-ex-)fiancée about his affair, she fucks off, and then he hooks up with Lisa and doesn't tell her a thing. But he really loves her, so it doesn't matter? It didn't work for me. Although, for what it's worth, the closing shot of the two of them kissing to "The Scientist" by Coldplay is pitch perfect (although I don't think that song's supposed to be happy, but whatevs).

Overall? I don't know what I'd rate it. It's emotional, and thoughtful, but lamentably marred by an extremely pat ending that ignores a lot of what preceded it. But Matthew Lillard turns in a solid supporting performance, and Rose Byrne is terrific as Alex; this I cannot stress enough. The soundtrack is pretty too (Mazzy Star fans keep an ear out) and, combined with the subject material and all the snow-covered scenery, it creates a fantastic sense of atmosphere. This is the first Paul McGuigan movie I've ever seen, but from where I'm standing, I'm very impressed.

So in summation: I recommend Wicker Park. Especially if you like feelin' romantic and stuff. Or stalking people.

Whew! That review did not come out the way I wanted it to at all. But I hope it came out alright.
Image
User avatar
Ribbons
SQUARE PEG
 
Posts: 9494
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:00 am

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Spandau Belly on Thu Oct 22, 2009 11:05 pm

tapehead wrote:The QT quote is lifted from 'Not Quite Hollywood', a really good review of Australian 70's cinema or 'Oz-ploitation'; I've seen Turkey shoot - it's expoitative, and daringly tasteless; almost sure to get some OLEG love at some point. BMX Bandits is like a biker movie for 12-year olds starring a pre pubescent Nicole Kidman and featuring stunts no sane parent would permit their kid actor to be involved in. Trenchard-Smith is necessary viewing for any kid who grew up in Australia in the 80's/90's who liked cheap thrills and violence onscreen, but it's almost a shame he has gotten so much play from the Doco, as imo other guys like Richard Franklin (RIP!), Phillipe Moira and slightly more well known guys like Russel Mulcahy and Simon Wincer (watch Snapshot) deserve more attention.
It's stunning how much QT seems to know about this period of Australian film-making, but so cool that people in other countries are discovering these movies (due to DVD releases abroad) as a result of Mark Hartley's film.


Thanks Tapehead. I did not grow up in Australia or in the 70s. But yes, one of OLEG brothers is an Ocker. I did a bit more digging and found Trenchard-Smith did become a DTV guy in Hollywood and did two of the LEPRECHAUN movies, which I have seen. Neither of those films really had a lot of standout auteuristic touches that would make me want to check out the director's other work. But obviously, Quinty is probably talking about the same movies you are talking about when he declares his love for Trenchard-Smith and those are likely his biggest passion projects with the most distinct flavour. I'll try to check them out eventually.

I know I can rent that NOT QUITE HOLLYWOOD doc, so I'll see that too.
Image
User avatar
Spandau Belly
self-fellating peacock
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:15 am
Location: Ontario

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby MadCapsule on Sat Oct 24, 2009 1:38 pm

I watched Amelie for the first time the other day. I thoroughly enjoyed myself. I love the little scrunchy-faced guy that has been in all of the movies I've seen from this director.

Sorry, I can't recall either of their names and I don't feel like looking them up right now.
User avatar
MadCapsule
GRANDO CARLISSIAN
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 5:53 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Spandau Belly on Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:14 pm

After my The Zone language tutor, Tapehead, recommended this doc because of my review of one of Brian Trenchard-Smith's films, I rented it.

NOT QUITE HOLLYWOOD

This is a really informative documentary about Australian b-movies, mostly from the 70s and 80s. I think unless you have actively researched this subject before or are an Australian over the age of 40, then most of this should be new to you. Speaking as a Canadian person under 30 years of age I would say I had only seen a couple of the films discussed in this doc and had maybe heard of about 20% of them before.

The film interviews many of the actors, writers, directors, and producers of these films as well as Quentin Tarantino who is a knowledgeable fan. They take you through the history in chronological order, starting in the 70s when Aussies really got into making movies. They started out with mostly sex comedies because comedy is cheap and the cheapest way to get a laugh is a sex joke. They make some money and start getting into horror, because as they say in the film: stunts are expensive but blood is cheap. Then move on to the big stunt movies.

None of these guys are terribly egotistical. They all kinda acknowledge that they made exploitive trash. The main figure of the film is a fellow named Tony Ginnane who is called the Roger Corman of Australia. He produced a lot of these movies with business savy wanting to make a few bucks and get his cock sucked and anything artistic that happened was bonus. He tried to tailor projects so that they could be easily be exported and make money in America in the drive-in circuit. Frequently this was with mixed results. Films starring some sort of washed up American actor in a lead role surrounded by Aussies, or getting Aussies to use American expressions when they spoke etc.

Tarantino is very knowledgeable about this subject, but like usual, he has kind of a distorted view of the universe. If you've ever heard him interviewed before you know what to expect. He jabbers in long run-on meandering sentences and always makes things out to be way bigger than they probably were. He talks a fair bit about his own film, Kill Bill, like it is the most culturally significant, gorey, and controversal film released in the last 20 years. The DVD of this doc has an extended scene you can view where Tarantino "interviews" Brian Trenchard-Smith. Tarantino mostly talks for about five minutes then kinda gets a question out at the end and Trenchard-Smith gives polite five word answers. It's very cute to see Trenchard-Smith's modesty and how he obviously doesn't consider himself anywhere near as good a filmmaker as Tarantino keeps telling him he is.

The doc moves along very quickly. If there's one thing I can criticize it for it is trying to make the doc too exciting by constantly playing screeching guitars when the people are talking and using a shitload of transition effects and Monty Python type animated sequences. But it is very educational, funny, and if you are like me and enjoy trashy movies about car crashes, tits, and shooting, then this film will help steer you towards several films you will want to rent.
Image
User avatar
Spandau Belly
self-fellating peacock
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:15 am
Location: Ontario

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby magicmonkey on Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:16 pm

Spandau Belly wrote:
NOT QUITE HOLLYWOOD
then this film will help steer you towards several films you will want to rent.


Hell yeah, I discovered the Australian "Next of Kin" this way, and it was bonza. Prior to this doc I'd only seen "BMX Bandits", "Lost Weekend" and Peter Weir's stuff. I imagine Tarantino discovered most of this stuff when filming "Kill Bill" and having what I presume to be a mainly Australian crew when shooting in China...

As Tape mentions, Aussie cinema stretches way beyond the scope of this doc too with stuff like "Sweetie", "Starstruck" and "Dogs in Space".
User avatar
magicmonkey
The laser gun carrying milkyway master
 
Posts: 5059
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:26 am
Location: Shanghizzo

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby DennisMM on Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:16 am

My Netflix queue finally hit I, Robot. For five years I've put this off, fascinated by the idea of turning Isaac Asimov's stories into a big-budget effects/action picture and horrified by the idea of turning Asimov's stories into a big-budget effects/action picture. It's bounced around in my queue as I added titles, but I let it rise and rise, and the DVD finally showed up in my mailbox earlier in the week.

Aw, hell no!

Will Smith actually says that. He really does. I thought the line was some sort of urban legend, an internet meme without any basis in fact. I was wrong. It personifies everything wrong with the film. Asimov's stories are about the differences between humans and robots, and how humans come to understand robots by using logic. The movie is about shooting digital robots and running and jumping on digital sets and crashing digital cars and having digital houses torn down around you by bigger digital robots.

Smith's character - meant to be a hard-nosed, cynical cop who nonetheless is very sharp - comes off as a bufoonish dullard whose bright moments as a detective seem random and lucky. He's much better at shooting digital robots and flying through digital sets than he is at convincing the viewer he's a perceptive investigator. By comparison, the closest character in Asimov's stories is a somewhat hard-nosed but quiet man who watches and listens rather than destroying everything around him with his sidearm.

Susan Calvin of the stories is a pinched, sexless, nearly emotionless psychologist who prefers the company of robots to humans, to the point that she can barely interact with the people around her. Bridget Moynihan's Calvin is uptight and too brainy by half, a drag on the investigation. Smith resents her until the shit starts flying. Then she's talking in slang and shooting digital robots with a machine gun and jumping around digital sets nearly as much as Smith. She's also very pretty in a bundled-up fashion - until the shit starts flying, at which point her hair goes loose and she's breathing hard and the concealing jacket comes off the body and she becomes the stereotypical female movie scientist who is a hot chick under the chilly public face. At least they didn't try to set her up as a romantic interest for Smith. I can't imagine how difficult that was to get past Fox.

Bruce Greenwood walks through his role as a high-powered businessman willing to play dirty to protect his company. James Cromwell is wasted in two very short scenes as the hologram of a murdered scientist. Chi McBride gets to do all the things a concerned but tough police lieutenant does in third-rate movies, even in the future - tell Smith he's on the wrong road, chew him out, suspend Smith and take his shield, and finally admit Smith was right all along. Big stretch. Alan Tudyk as Sonny is a digital robot, but he's the most interesting character in the movie. He's unpredictable and, eventually, more sympathetic than the humans.

Alex Proyas's direction is capable enough, but it's all visual. Has he done a movie that isn't more or less about the visuals? In this case he has more control than ever, because half the damned picture is digital. Give me a low-budget indy like Dark City any day over this mess. The script - wow. They say it was inspired by the stories of Isaac Asimov. If this is inspiration, I'll take plodding tedium.

Harlan Ellison wrote a script back in the late '70s, finishing just about the timeStar Wars hit. It incorporated elements from a number of Asimov's stories. They said it was impossible to make - just too expensive. Also, they wanted cute robots to play off the SW characters. Today, they could spend the kind of money it would take to film Ellison's script. They could put together a cast to play the material as drama. Greenwood and Cromwell could even have played the same parts, or Greenwood could have stepped into the role Ellison wrote for Martin Sheen. It would have been a good fit. An appropriate actress could have played Calvin - someone in her 40s or 50s, drab physically but hypercharged as a scientist. Ellison wanted Joanne Woodward at the time.

Oh, well, as I often say. 3/10

ETA: Going off to read Ellison's screenplay now. Get the bad taste out of my mouth.
User avatar
DennisMM
It's a strange world
 
Posts: 13700
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Not in Massachusetts

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Spandau Belly on Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:04 am

HEATHERS

I had not seen this movie since I was a youngster around the time it hit video when I had a raging crush on Winona Ryder. I think as a ten year old I actually understood the story, but I didn't remember much about the movie.

Like a lot of "black" comedies I foud myself smiling and thinking various things were clever, but rarely actually laughing out loud or even snickering. It does suffer a bit from being dated, which is not something I say very often since most of my favorite movies are from before "my time". But I'm sure it seemed a lot sharper and snappier when it came out. Ryder and Slater are both really good in the lead roles. The actresses playing the Heathers were weaker and kinda lacked the gr@vita$ needed to play these queens of the school.

I realize this film also probably speaks to women a lot more deeply because it is about female issues such as gossip, cliques, body image, and the irresistability of bad boy types. This is probably why two of this generation's biggest female screenwriters, Diablo Cody and Tina Fey, have both taken their stab at doing movies somewhat inspired by HEATHERS. This film is obviously a lot more of a direct influence on Diablo Cody in terms of dialogue style.

Overall, like a lot of these "classic" 80s comedies, it just doesn't have a huge appeal for me. I found some of the scenes amusing and like all of the ideas even if the execution sometimes didn't nail it for me. If you love comedies and the 80s teen movies, you'll probably love this film. Actually, you undoubtedly already love this film. But if you're a guy like me who is only ever luke warm on John Hughes stuff, then you'll find this movie cute but nothing you'll want to revisit and talk about.
Image
User avatar
Spandau Belly
self-fellating peacock
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:15 am
Location: Ontario

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby caruso_stalker217 on Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:49 am

Finally popped my NIGHT OF THE CREEPS cherry. It's every bit as good as I've heard. Tom Atkins like a motherfucker.
Image
User avatar
caruso_stalker217
TOO AGED FOR THIS MALARKEY
 
Posts: 4840
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: Oregon, US of A

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby TheBaxter on Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:34 am

ok, last night the gf and i were looking for something halloween-y to watch on comcast ondemand, and we saw somethiing called ...

FEAR NO EVIL

and the description sounded funny, something about a geeky high school kid who's really the devil, and being hunted by angels, blah blah. sounded like it would be kinda campy and fun, so we decided to watch it.

there are only three letters i can think of to describe this film.

W
T
F

this would probably be a good movie for MST3K, it's full of "huh" moments. but it's not out and out crazy stuff (well, except for the part where the repressed homosexual h.s. bully rips open his leather jacket and finds out he has b00bz), but mostly the tone and the acting and the scenes that just make no sense. the description is pretty accurate, there is a kid who is lucifer (whether that makes him the actual devil, or a demon, or what though, i'm not sure, because he didn't act much like SATAN, he acted more like a combination of carrie and damien) and he's being hunted by three angels in the form of a dead priest, an old woman, and a h.s. girl who doesn't realize she's an angel. at least, i think they are supposed to be angels... they have variations of angels names (raphael, michael, gabrielle) but the movie really isn't clear exactly what they're supposed to be. there are scenes that make no sense or have no purpose i could glean, like one scene where the lucifer kid walks into some old lady's room, lights her smoky thingie, and then leaves... and that's it. maybe it was supposed to be symbolic of something, i don't know, but it was just bizarre. and the whole film is kind of like that. there's also a scene where the h.s. bully attacks the lucifer kid... by cornering him in the gym shower and kissing him! it's been a while since h.s., but i don't remember bullies going around kissing other kids. there's the part where the townspeople all gather to watch a passion play which turns into an actual crucifixion. and then, if there's one scene you've got to see just for the pure camp of it, (maybe it's up on youtube) it's the "death by dodgeball" scene. i'll say no more.

the tone is super-ultra-serious, and the acting is over-the-top and performed at the community theater level of ability. when the lucifer kid finally becomes really evil at the end, he's got a cape or something and he goes running around, screaming and making faces and flaring out his cape like a 5-year-old kid playing dracula. and then all of the sudden it becomes a zombie movie when lucifer raises the dead. and then there's a glowing cross thing that the angels use, i think, to kill lucifer or send him back to the hell or something, but i'm not sure, because at the beginning the dead priest used the same glowing cross on another guy who was also lucifer to kill him, but he comes back as the kid.

basically, what i'm saying is, this is one nonsensical bizarre movie. i wouldn't even say it's bizarre in a good way though, because it just doesn't make sense. maybe if you get liquored up with a bunch of friends, and spend the whole time making fun of the acting and weird shit, it could be fun. otherwise it's useless. just to underscore the point, i looked it up on imdb to see if anyone there could make sense of the plot, and the imdb rating is 3.0. i'm pretty sure that's pretty low. i was trying to figure out if there was anyone i recognized who was responsible for this movie, and then i saw one of the producers was donald borchers. he also produced the original children of the corn, as well as producing and directing the remake that was on scifi channel a few weeks ago. all i can say is, when the supercheesy special fx kick in at the end, i should have known, because they were just as bad as the ones at the end of children of the corn.
Image
User avatar
TheBaxter
The Rastabortionist
 
Posts: 9985
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:00 pm

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby The Vicar on Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:57 am

caruso_stalker217 wrote:Finally popped my NIGHT OF THE CREEPS cherry. It's every bit as good as I've heard. Tom Atkins like a motherfucker.


"The good news is - your dates are here. The bad news is - they're dead...."
Great line.
Remember, remember the Fifth of November.......
.
Image
User avatar
The Vicar
Fear & Loathing in the Zone
 
Posts: 13511
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:21 am

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby DennisMM on Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:36 am

I remember watching Fear No Evil on cable many years ago and wondering if there was something wrong with the broadcast, because it didn't make any fucking sense at all!
User avatar
DennisMM
It's a strange world
 
Posts: 13700
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Not in Massachusetts

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby justcheckin on Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:03 pm

For halloween, I watched 28 Weeks again.... love it! and today, I finally got around to watching The Notebook. I liked it but I sort of had the whole plot worked out in advance.
"Everyone has a photographic memory; some just don't have the film."
User avatar
justcheckin
AIRWOLF
 
Posts: 1346
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:37 pm
Location: Backyard

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Spandau Belly on Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:27 am

For Halloween I ended up watching:

CHILD'S PLAY

I don't think I had ever actually seen this film end to end in one sitting. I have to say, it's actually pretty good. I still think BRIDE OF CHUCKY is probably the best of the series, but this firt one is a pretty good flick that doesn't suffer from seeming tame compared to overthetop sequels. I really liked the portrayal of the children's psychiatric institution like ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST, complete with rotting tiles on the walls and shock therapy machine.

There isn't a huge amount of suspense early on because even though they play the film like it could either be Chucky or the little boy who is doing the killing, we the audience know it's Chucky for sure because of the openning scene of Brad Dourif casting his soul into the doll. Maybe they should've put that scene in later as a flashback or something.

The kills are generally pretty funny and when Chucky is all unkillable at the end it's almost like a parody of TERMINATOR or something because he's so short it's just funny.

This movie also features the mum from 7TH HEAVEN, who I recently saw in STAR TREK 4: THE VOYAGE HOME as part of this education I am getting in the ways of Star Trek. My OLEG brothers and I will be discussing Star Trek in a few weeks and I am sure I will mix up stuff in STAR TREK 4 and CHILD'S PLAY because they star the same actress doing equally dated 80s things and I won't be able to keep them straight in my memory.

So overall, a pretty decent flick.
Image
User avatar
Spandau Belly
self-fellating peacock
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:15 am
Location: Ontario

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby DerLanghaarige on Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:26 am

Spandau Belly wrote:because even though they play the film like it could either be Chucky or the little boy who is doing the killing, we the audience know it's Chucky for sure because of the openning scene of Brad Dourif casting his soul into the doll.


This has always been my main point of criticism*. They try to make the audience guess who the real killer is, althought even the viewers, who have never heard of that movie and just accidently caught it on TV and missed the beginning of it, know that it can't be anybody else than that creepy doll!

*Together with the fact, that it's about a BOY who plays with a DOLL! And not even a cowboy doll, like Woody! Now, a god damn ugly doll of a kid! And nobody seems to care that the boy isn't a girl or doesn't play with action figures!
Image
User avatar
DerLanghaarige
Lohman's Wet Shirt
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby BuckyO'harre on Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:24 pm

Spandau Belly wrote:This movie also features the mum from 7TH HEAVEN, who I recently saw in STAR TREK 4: THE VOYAGE HOME as part of this education I am getting in the ways of Star Trek. My OLEG brothers and I will be discussing Star Trek in a few weeks and I am sure I will mix up stuff in STAR TREK 4 and CHILD'S PLAY because they star the same actress doing equally dated 80s things and I won't be able to keep them straight in my memory.



Star Trek The Motion Picture has the dad from 7TH Heaven, Stephen Collins.
User avatar
BuckyO'harre
AIRWOLF
 
Posts: 2616
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:14 am
Location: Captain's chair of the Righteous Indignation.

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby TheBaxter on Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:43 pm

DerLanghaarige wrote:*Together with the fact, that it's about a BOY who plays with a DOLL! And not even a cowboy doll, like Woody! Now, a god damn ugly doll of a kid! And nobody seems to care that the boy isn't a girl or doesn't play with action figures!


maybe they meant for this to be a prequel to 'lars and the real girl'
Image
User avatar
TheBaxter
The Rastabortionist
 
Posts: 9985
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:00 pm

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Chris a.k.a StuntMike on Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:46 pm

Just finished up that Monty Python doc I taped off TV.

Good stuff.
Image
User avatar
Chris a.k.a StuntMike
Not without incident
 
Posts: 2803
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:40 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Spandau Belly on Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:52 pm

BuckyO'harre wrote:
Spandau Belly wrote:This movie also features the mum from 7TH HEAVEN, who I recently saw in STAR TREK 4: THE VOYAGE HOME as part of this education I am getting in the ways of Star Trek. My OLEG brothers and I will be discussing Star Trek in a few weeks and I am sure I will mix up stuff in STAR TREK 4 and CHILD'S PLAY because they star the same actress doing equally dated 80s things and I won't be able to keep them straight in my memory.


Star Trek The Motion Picture has the dad from 7TH Heaven, Stephen Collins.


Yeah, I noticed that too. So has Jessica Beil done a Star Trek movie yet? Does this mean she's contractually obligated to do one as part of the general agreement between 7TH HEAVEN and STAR TREK?
Image
User avatar
Spandau Belly
self-fellating peacock
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:15 am
Location: Ontario

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Raziel on Sat Nov 14, 2009 5:19 pm

Drag Me To Hell - not bad.

The Damned United - watchable.

Nightbreed - imaginative, but a bit of a mess.

The Hills Run Red - stupid.

Bruno - pretty funny.

Bronson - grimly entertaining.
User avatar
Raziel
PRIMITIVE SCREWHEAD
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:44 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby caruso_stalker217 on Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:07 pm

I accidentally had my Netflix queue arranged in such a way that I was able to enjoy an odd Rachel Ward film noir double feature of DEAD MEN DON'T WEAR PLAID and AFTER DARK, MY SWEET.

I've known about DEAD MEN DON'T WEAR PLAID for years, but never got around to seeing it until now which makes me feel like an asshole because I love Steve Martin. I thought it was amusing overall with some truly hilarious shit here and there, such as the scene where Martin makes Burt Lancaster a cup of his "java." And an amusing running gag about him rearranging Rachel Ward's tits. Overall, a very enjoyable picture and a great love letter to film noir. It gets kinda distracting when you see Steve Martin interacting with Cary Grant and stuff, though.

AFTER DARK, MY SWEET is a true gem. If you haven't see it, do so. Jason Patric stars as a mentally unbalanced boxer-turned-vagrant who gets pulled into a kidnapping scheme by a mustachioed Bruce Dern and the lure of Rachel Ward's alcohol-soaked vagina. The film was released in 1990, but it easily could have been made in the '50s or '60s. Aside from a sweaty love scene complete with a shot of Ward's face as she is penetrated, there is no R-rated material to be found here. There is no shot of Bruce Dern's face as he is being penetrated to be found either. Seriously, though, if you are a fan of the genre of the crime stories and film noir and shit then you are obligated to check this out. It is a slowly-paced film that relies entirely on the actors to carry it. Jason Patric in particular is incredible. Aside from something like NARC I'd really only seen him in shit like THE LOST BOYS and SPEED 2 where he plays good-looking but uninteresting men who seem to shave every other day, so I had no idea the guy could actually fucking act. There is also kind of an odd score from Maurice "Lawrence of fucking Arabia" Jarre (R.I.P.) that sounds like it was done entirely with a Casio.
Image
User avatar
caruso_stalker217
TOO AGED FOR THIS MALARKEY
 
Posts: 4840
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: Oregon, US of A

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby DennisMM on Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:19 pm

The Weather Man (2005) was troubling for me. It featured a tormented Nicolas Cage, one of my favorite movie things, but it also featured a near-comatose, American-accented Michael Caine, which seemed a great waste of a fine actor. Putting Michael Caine in your film, positing him as a great man with great compassion, then having him play his actual dialogue very cooly seemed contradictory. The conflicts Cage faces are real enough, but he's just a bit too much of a dick for me to enjoy watching. He's not supposed to be completely unlikable, but he comes off as an unpleasant person even when he does the "right thing" for his kids and his ex-wife and his father. That would be understandable were this presented as a heavier drama about a man with psychological issues, but it's a dramedy at best, and not a deep one, about a neurotic. 7/10

Sara Silverman: Jesus is Magic reminded me that she's just not very funny. Shocking is not, on its surface, funny. Controversial is not, by itself, funny. There has to be some substance to make insult and racial and ethnic jokes more than mildly humorous. That's the difference between Lenny Bruce's style and Don Rickles', between Eddie Murphy's and Andrew Dice Clay's, and between, say, Chris Rock's and Sarah Silverman's. In the end, she has nothing to say. 4/10 for a few good lines.
User avatar
DennisMM
It's a strange world
 
Posts: 13700
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Not in Massachusetts

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby magicmonkey on Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:06 pm

Its been way too long since I posted in here. I'm just not watching enough movies! Good to read though what other folks can recommend tho still.

One of the last rememberable things I watched before an amazing blu ray of "The Thing"... was "Peacock", a Chinese movie shot my Changwei Gu, an old cinematographer of Zhang Yimou. Incidentally, Zhang Yimou started as a cinematographer for Chen Kaige on "Yellow Earth". Anyway... this movie looked astonishingly good, everything was composed, editing was cut down to a minimum as the camera was instead used to dictate the pace and flow. It really is refreshing to see this in modern cinema without thinking your head is gonna explode with a rapid fire of editing... The story is about three siblings, each finding their way in life in 1970's China, its a nostalgic tale, think any other movie that is set in the 1970's... but, despite its nostalgic panderings it is actually a really interesting watch packed with the kind of mise en scene that is normally reserved for an Alan Moore comic book or a Terry Gilliam flick, who says cinematic realism lacks style. It's very reminiscent of Taiwan's Edward Yang, whose "Yi yi" is simply a work of genius, although this movie is closer to perhaps his "A better brighter day".
User avatar
magicmonkey
The laser gun carrying milkyway master
 
Posts: 5059
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:26 am
Location: Shanghizzo

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby caruso_stalker217 on Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:56 am

DennisMM wrote:The Weather Man (2005) was troubling for me. It featured a tormented Nicolas Cage, one of my favorite movie things, but it also featured a near-comatose, American-accented Michael Caine, which seemed a great waste of a fine actor. Putting Michael Caine in your film, positing him as a great man with great compassion, then having him play his actual dialogue very cooly seemed contradictory. The conflicts Cage faces are real enough, but he's just a bit too much of a dick for me to enjoy watching. He's not supposed to be completely unlikable, but he comes off as an unpleasant person even when he does the "right thing" for his kids and his ex-wife and his father. That would be understandable were this presented as a heavier drama about a man with psychological issues, but it's a dramedy at best, and not a deep one, about a neurotic. 7/10


But in no other film where you hear Michael Caine utter the words "dildo" or "cameltoe."

Also, I Googled "cameltoe" and found this Wikipedia entry:

The causes of cameltoe are not always obvious. Cameltoe commonly occurs as a result of wearing tight fitting clothes, such as jeans, shorts, hotpants, or swimwear. Due to a combination of anatomical factors, the snugness of the fabric in the region surrounding the cleft of venus may result in the area of the crotch taking on the appearance of the forefoot of a camel or other even-toed ungulate.

However, some fashion analysts have also identified clothing design as a cause, rather than its size. Cameltoe may thus be exacerbated by jeans or other garments with a tight central seam that serves to divide the labia majora.

Cameltoe vs. bulge

Uncleft "bulges" are more often visible. The degree to which a woman's mons pubis protrudes depends on a number of factors, including weight and anatomical variation.
Image
User avatar
caruso_stalker217
TOO AGED FOR THIS MALARKEY
 
Posts: 4840
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: Oregon, US of A

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Bayouwolf on Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:35 pm

Djj's been on a zombie kick, and I've been along for the ride. So this week, Blockbuster delivered unto us Pontypool, Dead Snow and Dead Alive (or Braindead, depending on where you live/rent movies)


Dead Alive was supposed to be a Peter Jackson joint, but I thought I was watching an old Raimi flick without the US restrictions on copious amounts of gore (or satirical humor used in appropriate ways). The "zombies" followed no rules that we've all come to understand about zombies, and they apparently can copulate. The final 30 minutes were a gore hounds wet-dream, but the rest of the film tries to be far more sophisticated than it actually was... 5/10

Dead Snow ...It wasn't bad, but it wasn't great either, Again, the typical zombie genre rules go out the window, but the gore factor is pretty high (and in some ways comical). Not quite Army of Darkness funny, but the humor was there to break up the scares... 6/10

Pontypool was the standout for me. It had me hooked from the first scene till the last. If you like a heavy dose of suspense mixed with some light graphic violence, then que this one up for sure... 8/10
User avatar
Bayouwolf
Country Bouy
 
Posts: 2375
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:55 pm
Location: Coming soon to a theater near you...

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby darkjedijaina on Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:28 pm

you forgot zombie tokyo!
darkjedijaina
BAD ASH
 
Posts: 6714
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:41 am

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby magicmonkey on Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:12 pm

Bayouwolf wrote:

Dead Alive was supposed to be a Peter Jackson joint, but I thought I was watching an old Raimi flick without the US restrictions on copious amounts of gore (or satirical humor used in appropriate ways). The "zombies" followed no rules that we've all come to understand about zombies, and they apparently can copulate. The final 30 minutes were a gore hounds wet-dream, but the rest of the film tries to be far more sophisticated than it actually was... 5/10



5! %! That film kicks ass for the lord... I dunno, maybe I read the film a bit differently as an allegory of British Colonialism in New Zealand. But, I'd definately give that film a 10 just for the baby in the park scene alone. :lol:
User avatar
magicmonkey
The laser gun carrying milkyway master
 
Posts: 5059
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:26 am
Location: Shanghizzo

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby DennisMM on Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:35 am

caruso_stalker217 wrote:
DennisMM wrote:The Weather Man (2005) was troubling for me. It featured a tormented Nicolas Cage, one of my favorite movie things, but it also featured a near-comatose, American-accented Michael Caine, which seemed a great waste of a fine actor. Putting Michael Caine in your film, positing him as a great man with great compassion, then having him play his actual dialogue very cooly seemed contradictory. The conflicts Cage faces are real enough, but he's just a bit too much of a dick for me to enjoy watching. He's not supposed to be completely unlikable, but he comes off as an unpleasant person even when he does the "right thing" for his kids and his ex-wife and his father. That would be understandable were this presented as a heavier drama about a man with psychological issues, but it's a dramedy at best, and not a deep one, about a neurotic. 7/10


But in no other film where you hear Michael Caine utter the words "dildo" or "cameltoe."


Very true. Also not "What is a frosty?" In my original comments I forgot to mention that I was constantly distracted by the fast food product placements. Not only placements, but actual mentions in the dialogue. It was cheap and distracting.
Last edited by DennisMM on Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DennisMM
It's a strange world
 
Posts: 13700
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Not in Massachusetts

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby DennisMM on Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:36 am

Bayouwolf wrote:Pontypool was the standout for me. It had me hooked from the first scene till the last. If you like a heavy dose of suspense mixed with some light graphic violence, then que this one up for sure... 8/10


Is that the one set largely in a radio station? I get so confused.
User avatar
DennisMM
It's a strange world
 
Posts: 13700
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Not in Massachusetts

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby darkjedijaina on Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:43 am

thats the one, dennis.
darkjedijaina
BAD ASH
 
Posts: 6714
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:41 am

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby DennisMM on Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:06 am

Thank you, djj. I've heard very good things about it.
User avatar
DennisMM
It's a strange world
 
Posts: 13700
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Not in Massachusetts

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby stereosforgeeks on Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:28 am

DennisMM wrote:Thank you, djj. I've heard very good things about it.


the book is pretty cool as well.
User avatar
stereosforgeeks
Re-Wound
 
Posts: 7380
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: DCish

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby The Vicar on Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:54 pm

Picked up Season Five of Angel for $13.96 at Walmart.
$13.96.
Shite. The final ep alone was worth that.
Remember, remember the Fifth of November.......
.
Image
User avatar
The Vicar
Fear & Loathing in the Zone
 
Posts: 13511
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:21 am

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Bloo on Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:01 pm

The Vicar wrote:Picked up Season Five of Angel for $13.96 at Walmart.
$13.96.
Shite. The final ep alone was worth that.


damn I need to look for that, that is probably my favorite season, the great final episdoe, the funny muppet episode, Spike
"is it to early to hate this movie with a flaming passion that burns with the heat of a 1,000 suns?"

"well we're only 2 minutes in so...no"
User avatar
Bloo
Really ties the room together
 
Posts: 4460
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:26 pm
Location: Kansas, home of the Bacon Explosion

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby DennisMM on Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:28 am

That is quite the damned deal. I'll have to remember to look when I'm at Mall*Wart next.
User avatar
DennisMM
It's a strange world
 
Posts: 13700
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Not in Massachusetts

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby Peven on Sat Nov 21, 2009 7:35 pm

over the last 24 hours I watched two movies i have owned for a while but have never seen before; "Blood Simple" and "Confidence".

"Blood Simple", like its name, is quite simple, actually. quite simply good. the Coen's first movie and you see their style as there from the beginning. you can actually see bits they drew from for their movies that followed, imo. really should have seen this a while ago


"Confidence" is a con movie, with a decent cast, including a young Rachel Weiss looking hawt though we get to see no skin, Andy Garcia, Dustin Hoffman, Paul Giamatti and Ed Burns. not as good as it might have been, not quite the "wow" at the end the movie seems to feel it delivers, but alright and i didn't regret giving a couple hours of my life watching it.
Image

"I didn't get nothin', I had to pay $50 and pick up the garbage"
User avatar
Peven
Is This Real Life?
 
Posts: 8838
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:45 am
Location: Group W bench

Re: What have you been watching? (DVD or Films on TV)

Postby justcheckin on Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:20 pm

The Sphere came on today... watched it :)
"Everyone has a photographic memory; some just don't have the film."
User avatar
justcheckin
AIRWOLF
 
Posts: 1346
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:37 pm
Location: Backyard

PreviousNext

Return to DVD / Blu-ray

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest