Moriarty's DVD Blog 2007 (UPDATED WITH NEW GAME)

Betamax and beyond

Postby MuffinHunter on Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:35 pm

havocSchultz wrote:Well that's understandable, but I think the concern stems from the fact that if you're supposed to root for a character - there should be something likeable and/or root-worthy in the character to begin with...

That's how I see it at least...


I get that, but I guess it's still sort of what I'm talking about: is "rooting for" a character the only thing that can get you into a film?
MuffinHunter
GLIB
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby minstrel on Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:45 pm

MuffinHunter wrote:Not going to jump into the Hulk debate here, but I have a question triggered by part of it:

Is it necessary for you to find the characters in a film likeable in order to enjoy it? It's really not for me, but I hear this complaint leveled so often and it baffles me. I could care less if the characters are dickheads or saints, as long as they're handled well.


This is a very interesting point. It always comes up in conversations I have with my roomie, who loves Scorsese films like Casino and Goodfellas.

I have to say that the first few times I saw these films, I loved them too. But my roomie watches them over and over, and I must have seen them, in whole or in part, perhaps nearly 100 times each. And my opinion of them has changed. I now think of them as outstanding films, featuring great direction, acting, writing, and almost everything else, but I can't say I LIKE them anymore. And the reason is that they are about small-minded, generally ignorant, violent characters - UGLY characters. I've found that I don't like to spend a lot of time in the company of people like Scorsese's characters.
"Everybody is equally shitty and wrong." - Ribbons
User avatar
minstrel
Leader of the Insquirrelgency
 
Posts: 12634
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: Area 52

Postby Fawst on Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:56 pm

You mean like basically every single character in The Departed?
Prince of the Land of Stench!
User avatar
Fawst
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:11 pm
Location: MacLaren's

Postby Al Shut on Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:02 pm

MuffinHunter wrote:
havocSchultz wrote:Well that's understandable, but I think the concern stems from the fact that if you're supposed to root for a character - there should be something likeable and/or root-worthy in the character to begin with...

That's how I see it at least...


I get that, but I guess it's still sort of what I'm talking about: is "rooting for" a character the only thing that can get you into a film?



HAving a character that is root-worrthy or likeable is just one way for a movie to be interesting. Sometimes I don't care about the characters but am interested in the story as a whole and especially around here I#m sure a lot of people are able to enjoy a movie solely on technical merits.
Note to myself: Fix this image shit!
User avatar
Al Shut
THE LAUGHING ZONER
 
Posts: 6239
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: Oberhausen, Germany

Postby minstrel on Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:05 pm

Fawst wrote:You mean like basically every single character in The Departed?


Yeah. I like The Departed, but I've only seen it once. I'll probably like it the next two or three times I see it. And then, I won't want to spend time with those characters any more.
"Everybody is equally shitty and wrong." - Ribbons
User avatar
minstrel
Leader of the Insquirrelgency
 
Posts: 12634
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: Area 52

Postby WinslowLeach on Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:05 pm

Its not just the characters its just the overall feel of the film. I also didnt like how it was made, it just didnt work for me. I think it was the story and the way the characters were portrayed, there was simply nothing in The Hulk that pulled me in and got me interested in it.

Just because a character is a jerk isnt what its about, its about how the actors play the roles and how its layed out in the movie. HULKs characters were just lifeless to me.

I wasnt really kidding about liking the 70s TV show more. I do like it more simply because its written really well and you get to know the characters and care about them. Especially in super hero movies you have to give the audience time to get to know the main characters and feel for them before you throw the CGI FX sequences in.

We're talking about SUPER HERO movies, not Scorsese crime films, thats a different sport. Yes, when I watch a super hero movie I want to feel something for the main character, if you dont at least have that, the movie is gonna be a dud.
Last edited by WinslowLeach on Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
WinslowLeach
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 4079
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 2:39 pm
Location: The Deuce

Postby minstrel on Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:09 pm

One of the things I didn't like about the Hulk was Eric Bana. This guy doesn't impress me at all as an actor. The only movie I thought he was any good at all in was Troy - weird, huh? But in the Hulk, he was a zero on the screen for me. And that's a bad thing for a lead performance.

Oh - he was ok in Munich.
"Everybody is equally shitty and wrong." - Ribbons
User avatar
minstrel
Leader of the Insquirrelgency
 
Posts: 12634
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: Area 52

Postby Fawst on Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:22 pm

I have to agree. I remember being underwhelmed by Bana's Banner. But he was fucking amazing in Munich, and very good in Troy.
Prince of the Land of Stench!
User avatar
Fawst
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:11 pm
Location: MacLaren's

Postby havocSchultz on Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:28 pm

MuffinHunter wrote:
havocSchultz wrote:Well that's understandable, but I think the concern stems from the fact that if you're supposed to root for a character - there should be something likeable and/or root-worthy in the character to begin with...

That's how I see it at least...


I get that, but I guess it's still sort of what I'm talking about: is "rooting for" a character the only thing that can get you into a film?


No - but it does help if the film is trying to get you to root for them...
Like has been mentioned - some films have characters that we're not supposed to like...
But, also like's been mentioned - something like a superhero film usually makes you want to "root" for the characters a little more...

It does work both ways and I do see both sides of the argument...

I'm in the middle in regards to Hulk itself...there were alot of moments I enjoyed - and some stuff I really liked - but there was also alot that I didn't enjoy and actually had me saying "WTF?!?!?"

It was an impressive experiment on the whole super hero genre - but for a film - that technically is supposed to be accessible to the broadest audience possible - I think it failed on that part...
I'm not saying that's a good or bad thing - but that is a thing...

Either way - Hulk or no Hulk - Jennifer Connelly could probably take some time off for awhile and learn how to fucking smile again...
User avatar
havocSchultz
is full of stars...
 
Posts: 15695
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:46 am
Location: living amongst a hazy nothing...

Postby minstrel on Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:29 pm

Fawst wrote:I have to agree. I remember being underwhelmed by Bana's Banner. But he was fucking amazing in Munich, and very good in Troy.


Maybe he's one of those actors who's only as good as the movie he's in. Munich was good, so Bana was good. Hulk wasn't, so Bana wasn't.
"Everybody is equally shitty and wrong." - Ribbons
User avatar
minstrel
Leader of the Insquirrelgency
 
Posts: 12634
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: Area 52

Postby godzillasushi on Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:50 pm

minstrel wrote:
Fawst wrote:I have to agree. I remember being underwhelmed by Bana's Banner. But he was fucking amazing in Munich, and very good in Troy.


Maybe he's one of those actors who's only as good as the movie he's in. Munich was good, so Bana was good. Hulk wasn't, so Bana wasn't.


Im proud to be jumping into the Bana Royale. Just to be fair, I looked at the movies he's made and there aren't many. I was suprised to see only 4-5 biggies that he has actually been in. Which means he has done pretty well for himself since almost none of them are horribly bad.

minstrel wrote:Hulk dogs. Really, really dumb idea.


Well yea, when you put it that way most of that crap is dumb lol. All the superhero stuff is corny as a matter of fact.
ImageImage
Image
User avatar
godzillasushi
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Destroying Sony Headquarters in Japan

Postby papalazeru on Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:55 pm

I agree... The dogs were rubbish but the film was great.

Live on HULK!
Papa: The musical!

Padders: "Not very classy! Not very classy at all!"
So Sorry "I'll give you a word to describe it: classless."
Cptn Kirks 2pay: ".....utterly unclassy....."
DennisMM: "...Decidedly unclassy..."
User avatar
papalazeru
Not very classy! Not very classy at all!!
 
Posts: 11475
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 5:26 am

Postby Moriarty on Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:53 pm

I rewatched HULK last night, then signed on this morning and noticed how this had sort of erupted here in this thread.

I am Winslow Leach's total opposite.

I just plain love this film.

And, BTW, the Hulk Dogs... straight out of the comic.

Here's my original review: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/15559

I'm not going to regurgitate all of that here. I'll just say that the editing was Oscar-worthy, and I think Hulk himself is as successful a CG creation as Davy Jones or Kong. I love him. I think he's got personality to spare.

And I know the film is crazy. That's why I like it.
User avatar
Moriarty
BOMB IN RIBCAGE
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:18 am
Location: Somewhere underneath Hollywood Blvd.

Postby havocSchultz on Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:55 pm

Moriarty wrote:I rewatched HULK last night, then signed on this morning and noticed how this had sort of erupted here in this thread.

I am Winslow Leach's total opposite.

I just plain love this film.

And, BTW, the Hulk Dogs... straight out of the comic.

Here's my original review: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/15559

I'm not going to regurgitate all of that here. I'll just say that the editing was Oscar-worthy, and I think Hulk himself is as successful a CG creation as Davy Jones or Kong. I love him. I think he's got personality to spare.

And I know the film is crazy. That's why I like it.


So could you please explain exactly what the hell was happening at the end...?
The whole climax/battle/light show whatever the fuck it was kinda thing...?

Cause that's the point of most of my concern...
User avatar
havocSchultz
is full of stars...
 
Posts: 15695
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:46 am
Location: living amongst a hazy nothing...

Postby Keepcoolbutcare on Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:58 pm

WinslowLeach wrote:Ill stick with Spider Man...Even The use of CGI is better!


there are loads of sequences in the first Spider Man film that look really, really tacky 'n cartoonish and just plain awkward.

tho' I will admit Spider Man as a vehicle was more readily built for emo than the Hulk.

but I'll also proudly admit to enjoying and watching The Hulk more than SM I.
Personally, I'm an atheist in the voting booth and a theist in the movie theatre. I separate the morality of religion with the spirituality and solace of it. There is something boring about atheism.
User avatar
Keepcoolbutcare
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 9407
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:14 am
Location: Blacktionville

Postby Keepcoolbutcare on Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:02 pm

havocSchultz wrote:So could you please explain exactly what the hell was happening at the end...?
The whole climax/battle/light show whatever the fuck it was kinda thing...?

Cause that's the point of most of my concern...


you've seen Akira?

now, imagine if all of Freud's theories could manifest themselves with a gloopy physicality.

and...scene!
Personally, I'm an atheist in the voting booth and a theist in the movie theatre. I separate the morality of religion with the spirituality and solace of it. There is something boring about atheism.
User avatar
Keepcoolbutcare
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 9407
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:14 am
Location: Blacktionville

Postby WinslowLeach on Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:03 pm

I dont know guys, I guess we have diff tastes on this one. I think Spider Man is WAY better as a super hero origin film. Sam really got that character down and the CGI thats "tacky and cartoonish" I actually think looks great.

Again, I really really dont like The Hulk at all. No offense to you Hulksters. I hope the next version is more to my liking though.
Last edited by WinslowLeach on Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
WinslowLeach
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 4079
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 2:39 pm
Location: The Deuce

Postby minstrel on Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:03 pm

Moriarty wrote:And, BTW, the Hulk Dogs... straight out of the comic.



My bad. I bow to your superior expertise. :oops:

But Hulk dogs are still a bad idea, even if they did appear first in the comic.
"Everybody is equally shitty and wrong." - Ribbons
User avatar
minstrel
Leader of the Insquirrelgency
 
Posts: 12634
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: Area 52

Postby havocSchultz on Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:05 pm

Keepcoolbutcare wrote:
havocSchultz wrote:So could you please explain exactly what the hell was happening at the end...?
The whole climax/battle/light show whatever the fuck it was kinda thing...?

Cause that's the point of most of my concern...


you've seen Akira?

now, imagine if all of Freud's theories could manifest themselves with a gloopy physicality.

and...scene!


Sadly...I've never seen Akira...

It's one of those shameful things that I've been trying to rectify recently...

So if I see that - will I appreciate Hulk more...?

Or should I just get nice and stoned first...?
Cause I've only seen it the first time in theatres with my nephew...
So maybe we'll see what happens...
User avatar
havocSchultz
is full of stars...
 
Posts: 15695
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:46 am
Location: living amongst a hazy nothing...

Postby tapehead on Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:08 pm

minstrel wrote:
Fawst wrote:I have to agree. I remember being underwhelmed by Bana's Banner. But he was fucking amazing in Munich, and very good in Troy.


Maybe he's one of those actors who's only as good as the movie he's in. Munich was good, so Bana was good. Hulk wasn't, so Bana wasn't.


Nope - for proof of this, see Black Hawk Down and especially watch CHOPPER - both great films, but the latter is especially elevated by Bana's killer performance.

I love Ang Lee's Hulk.

havocSchultz wrote:Sadly...I've never seen Akira...

It's one of those shameful things that I've been trying to rectify recently...

So if I see that - will I appreciate Hulk more...?


If you see Akira, Urotsukidoji, the Legend of the Overfiend, Ninja Scrolls and maybe, Wicked City, a lot of Japanese culture will start to make more sense, or at least, it did for me.



Watch them stoned, over and over again.
User avatar
tapehead
BALLS!!!
 
Posts: 9427
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:13 pm
Location: OZ

Postby Keepcoolbutcare on Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:14 pm

havocSchultz wrote:So if I see that - will I appreciate Hulk more...?


'prolly not.

havocSchultz wrote:Or should I just get nice and stoned first...?


like you've gotta ask!

Watching 'em back to back whilst blazed would of course be my recommendation...
Personally, I'm an atheist in the voting booth and a theist in the movie theatre. I separate the morality of religion with the spirituality and solace of it. There is something boring about atheism.
User avatar
Keepcoolbutcare
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 9407
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:14 am
Location: Blacktionville

Postby havocSchultz on Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:19 pm

tapehead wrote:
havocSchultz wrote:Sadly...I've never seen Akira...

It's one of those shameful things that I've been trying to rectify recently...

So if I see that - will I appreciate Hulk more...?


If you see Akira, Urotsukidoji, the Legend of the Overfiend, Ninja Scrolls and maybe, Wicked City, a lot of Japanese culture will start to make more sense, or at least, it did for me.



Watch them stoned, over and over again.


Keepcoolbutcare wrote:


havocSchultz wrote:Or should I just get nice and stoned first...?


like you've gotta ask!

Watching 'em back to back whilst blazed would of course be my recommendation...


Well...can't argue with that...

I'm always looking for a recommendation to get stoned to...
User avatar
havocSchultz
is full of stars...
 
Posts: 15695
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:46 am
Location: living amongst a hazy nothing...

Postby Pacino86845 on Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:21 pm

tapehead wrote: If you see Akira, Urotsukidoji, the Legend of the Overfiend, Ninja Scrolls and maybe, Wicked City, a lot of Japanese culture will start to make more sense, or at least, it did for me.


Then remind yourself that Hulk is a Taiwanese director's attempt at Greek tragedy, and then get-

stoned, over and over again.
User avatar
Pacino86845
EGYPTIAN LOVER
 
Posts: 14064
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:20 am

Postby Theta on Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:43 pm

Moriarty wrote:I'll just say that the editing was Oscar-worthy, and I think Hulk himself is as successful a CG creation as Davy Jones or Kong. I love him. I think he's got personality to spare.

And I know the film is crazy. That's why I like it.


The editing got COMPLETELY screwed at the Oscars. I heard it was because of the CGI-intensive process; they felt it was less "editing" and more "visual effects."

I think "Hulk" is a "ten-year's-time" movie. As in, ten years from now, it's going to be a really popular film that people can't believe bombed when it came out. The same goes for "The Fountain."
This comment is in no way meant to insist your opinion is wrong or be considered an edict, solely this poster's opinion. That said, you are still a fool and will kneel before me in supplication.
User avatar
Theta
AIRWOLF
 
Posts: 2343
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:57 am
Location: Boston, MA

Postby Moriarty on Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:03 pm

havocSchultz wrote:
Moriarty wrote:I rewatched HULK last night, then signed on this morning and noticed how this had sort of erupted here in this thread.

I am Winslow Leach's total opposite.

I just plain love this film.

And, BTW, the Hulk Dogs... straight out of the comic.

Here's my original review: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/15559

I'm not going to regurgitate all of that here. I'll just say that the editing was Oscar-worthy, and I think Hulk himself is as successful a CG creation as Davy Jones or Kong. I love him. I think he's got personality to spare.

And I know the film is crazy. That's why I like it.


So could you please explain exactly what the hell was happening at the end...?
The whole climax/battle/light show whatever the fuck it was kinda thing...?

Cause that's the point of most of my concern...


Sure.

Actually, one of my favorite images in the film is the start of that scene. Nolte absorbs whatever he is exposed to. So when he starts sucking the electricity right out of that cable, he turns into electricity.

When he tries to escape through the roof, Hulk grabs onto him, and that's the trip through the clouds. Each time the electricity pierces a new cloud, we get a burned-in image of the Hulk holding on in some new pose. Watch that scene on DVD and pause each of those different poses. There's never been a more abstract but gorgeous scene in a mainstream superhero movie. It's amazing how pretty the whole thing is.

Once they reach the lake and start fighting, you see Nolte take on the features of whatever Hulk slams him into. Rock. Dirt. Water.

It's a very strange sequence, but it's also more genuinely comic book than almost any other Marvel movie. If these were just still illustrations, I don't think anyone would have had an issue with it. But because we've really never seen a superhero fight on this level put on film, it's surreal.

And I think the entire psychodrama of the film builds to the ending of that fight, when Bruce beats his father by simply letting go of all the pain and sublimated anger of his life. It's the one energy his dad can't handle.

And if you remain unmoved by the last shot of Bruce, flashing back to the one good memory of his dad as he lays under the surface of that lake, then I give up. You and the movie are just on different wavelengths.
User avatar
Moriarty
BOMB IN RIBCAGE
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:18 am
Location: Somewhere underneath Hollywood Blvd.

Postby Fawst on Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:05 pm

Ugh, when does The Fountain come out on DVD??? Can't be soon enough, cuz of COURSE I missed that in the theater. And Children of Men isn't playing anywhere near me either. Bastards. Thank GOD, Daddy's Little Girls or whatever the fuck it's called is playing! :P

Back to the Hulk.

Agreed on the Akira comparison. The Hulk is a mindfuck of a movie at times, and I love that kind of film. 2001, Akira, Zardoz, Time Bandits, The Hulk... shit, I think I just started MY "Essentials" collection.
Prince of the Land of Stench!
User avatar
Fawst
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:11 pm
Location: MacLaren's

Postby havocSchultz on Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:07 pm

Moriarty wrote:
havocSchultz wrote:
Moriarty wrote:I rewatched HULK last night, then signed on this morning and noticed how this had sort of erupted here in this thread.

I am Winslow Leach's total opposite.

I just plain love this film.

And, BTW, the Hulk Dogs... straight out of the comic.

Here's my original review: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/15559

I'm not going to regurgitate all of that here. I'll just say that the editing was Oscar-worthy, and I think Hulk himself is as successful a CG creation as Davy Jones or Kong. I love him. I think he's got personality to spare.

And I know the film is crazy. That's why I like it.


So could you please explain exactly what the hell was happening at the end...?
The whole climax/battle/light show whatever the fuck it was kinda thing...?

Cause that's the point of most of my concern...


Sure.

Actually, one of my favorite images in the film is the start of that scene. Nolte absorbs whatever he is exposed to. So when he starts sucking the electricity right out of that cable, he turns into electricity.

When he tries to escape through the roof, Hulk grabs onto him, and that's the trip through the clouds. Each time the electricity pierces a new cloud, we get a burned-in image of the Hulk holding on in some new pose. Watch that scene on DVD and pause each of those different poses. There's never been a more abstract but gorgeous scene in a mainstream superhero movie. It's amazing how pretty the whole thing is.

Once they reach the lake and start fighting, you see Nolte take on the features of whatever Hulk slams him into. Rock. Dirt. Water.

It's a very strange sequence, but it's also more genuinely comic book than almost any other Marvel movie. If these were just still illustrations, I don't think anyone would have had an issue with it. But because we've really never seen a superhero fight on this level put on film, it's surreal.

And I think the entire psychodrama of the film builds to the ending of that fight, when Bruce beats his father by simply letting go of all the pain and sublimated anger of his life. It's the one energy his dad can't handle.

And if you remain unmoved by the last shot of Bruce, flashing back to the one good memory of his dad as he lays under the surface of that lake, then I give up. You and the movie are just on different wavelengths.


Thanks a bunch...

Like I mentioned a few posts above - I only saw it the one time upon initial release...and I might've zoned out a bit by that point cause it was late...

I just always felt really confused by the whole ordeal and walked away from it...

But - now knowing all this - as well as KCBC and Tapehead's "get stoned for it" suggestions, I'll have to pick it up and try it again...

On a related note - is the DVD out there a pretty good one...?
Good transfer?
Nice features?
Etc...?

I guess it's time for me to SMASH PUNY 1ST IMPRESSIONS!!!!
User avatar
havocSchultz
is full of stars...
 
Posts: 15695
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:46 am
Location: living amongst a hazy nothing...

Postby Nordling on Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:07 pm

That's as perfect an explanation of the ending as I've read, Mori. Well done.
Image
User avatar
Nordling
AIRWOLF
 
Posts: 2092
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 8:39 am
Location: Missouri City, TX

Postby Nordling on Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:09 pm

CHILDREN OF MEN comes out 3/27 on DVD. THE FOUNTAIN supposedly comes out 5/15.
Image
User avatar
Nordling
AIRWOLF
 
Posts: 2092
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 8:39 am
Location: Missouri City, TX

Postby Fawst on Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:11 pm

Superb, Nord, thanks :)

And yes, Mori, good explanation. Far better than my original "He's absorbing man. He absorbed," explanation that I gave to my friends. They didn't get it. And that made me go "Oh, never MIND, you just don't get it."
Prince of the Land of Stench!
User avatar
Fawst
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:11 pm
Location: MacLaren's

Postby Moriarty on Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:38 pm

Fawst wrote:Superb, Nord, thanks :)

And yes, Mori, good explanation. Far better than my original "He's absorbing man. He absorbed," explanation that I gave to my friends. They didn't get it. And that made me go "Oh, never MIND, you just don't get it."


Part of why I like the ending but it confuses people is there's no scene where Nick Nolte says, "I AM ABSORBING MAN! I HAVE THE ABILITY TO ABSORB THINGS!" That's how most comic book movies would have handled him. Instead, Ang Lee actually trusts us to pick it up visually.

Shows what he knows!
User avatar
Moriarty
BOMB IN RIBCAGE
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:18 am
Location: Somewhere underneath Hollywood Blvd.

Postby Dark Knight on Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:39 pm

Anybody else think that Nolte was robbed of an oscar nom?
El Wray will find the missing reel, just watch...
User avatar
Dark Knight
GRANDO CARLISSIAN
 
Posts: 657
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:33 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Postby Andre Dellamorte on Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:49 pm

Moriarty wrote:And if you remain unmoved by the last shot of Bruce, flashing back to the one good memory of his dad as he lays under the surface of that lake, then I give up. You and the movie are just on different wavelengths.


Bruce gives his dad the rage, which turns pops into a mushroom cloud jellyfish, and in the moment of his father's death, the man whose sins made him, Bruce is reminded that part of him still loves his father. Heartbreaking, but also, you're totally fucked, because you're defined by that. You are your scars. Yeah, great film.
Busting makes me feel good.
User avatar
Andre Dellamorte
TOMBOY BEANPOLE
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Los Angeles, Ca.

Postby Moriarty on Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:07 pm

Andre Dellamorte wrote:
Moriarty wrote:And if you remain unmoved by the last shot of Bruce, flashing back to the one good memory of his dad as he lays under the surface of that lake, then I give up. You and the movie are just on different wavelengths.


Bruce gives his dad the rage, which turns pops into a mushroom cloud jellyfish, and in the moment of his father's death, the man whose sins made him, Bruce is reminded that part of him still loves his father. Heartbreaking, but also, you're totally fucked, because you're defined by that. You are your scars. Yeah, great film.


And to carry it a beat further, Ang Lee actually makes General Ross a man of conscience. When the gamma bomb hits the lake, you can see that a piece of Ross is genuinely ashamed to make that call. And Betty sees that in him, so she's getting just as fucked up a hit of parental love/parental loathing in that moment.

I forgot how Elliott and Nolte both brought their A-game to the film. Elliott in particular seems to get exactly what movie Lee's making. In many ways, he is the conflicted hero of the movie. He is a very good military man. The response to Hulk in every scene is overwhelming and credible. They don't fuck around with him, and they don't half-ass it. They come at him really, really hard. But Elliott never once plays Ross as the villain of the film.
User avatar
Moriarty
BOMB IN RIBCAGE
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:18 am
Location: Somewhere underneath Hollywood Blvd.

Postby John-Locke on Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:32 pm

HULK is without a doubt my favourite comic book/superhero movie, I've said it in the TB's and here in the Zone countless times before so I'm not going to go into detail as to why I really like the film (despite it's flaws) but just thought it was worth having it on record here too as there are so many others showing their support for it.

Two things I will mention though, firstly you have to see HULK on the biggest screen you can find, the Desert scenes in particular are not done justice on a shitty 32" CRT TV, it's impossible to get a sense of the scale of that masterful scene, I'm dying to see it in a cinema again. Secondly I'm not sure I would recommend smoking a studly one before watching the film, I have only managed to watch the entire film stoned once, it gets so trippy towards the end that it overloads my mind almost every single time and I fall asleep as the climax is happening if there is even a hint of tiredness in my body.
Image
User avatar
John-Locke
BULLETPROOF TIGER
 
Posts: 12365
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 7:49 am
Location: Unknown

Postby Peven on Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:34 pm

it isn't my absolute favorite comic movie, but it is one of my favorites. and i think the Hulk-dog fight may be the best comic fight scene ever.
Image

perversely contrarian since 2005
Peven
Is This Real Life?
 
Posts: 14871
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 10:45 am
Location: Group W bench

Postby WinslowLeach on Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:41 pm

Zzzzzzzzzzzz.
User avatar
WinslowLeach
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 4079
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 2:39 pm
Location: The Deuce

Postby buster00 on Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:43 pm

Moriarty wrote:
Fawst wrote:Superb, Nord, thanks :)

And yes, Mori, good explanation. Far better than my original "He's absorbing man. He absorbed," explanation that I gave to my friends. They didn't get it. And that made me go "Oh, never MIND, you just don't get it."


Part of why I like the ending but it confuses people is there's no scene where Nick Nolte says, "I AM ABSORBING MAN! I HAVE THE ABILITY TO ABSORB THINGS!" That's how most comic book movies would have handled him. Instead, Ang Lee actually trusts us to pick it up visually.

Shows what he knows!


It was one of the scenes in Fantastic Four that I hated the most: The part when that reporter asked Johnny, "What are your superhero names?" And they flashed individual pictures of the team on the Jumbotron while Johnny is, presumably, making up code names for them on the spot.

How eyeball-gougingly stupid.

I suppose there's really no graceful way to go about it. I'm with you; I would just as sidestep the issue, Ang Lee style.
User avatar
buster00
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 6402
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:12 pm

Postby WinslowLeach on Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:49 pm

coughbrownnoserscough
User avatar
WinslowLeach
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 4079
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 2:39 pm
Location: The Deuce

Postby Moriarty on Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:52 pm

You're a brownnoserscough!
User avatar
Moriarty
BOMB IN RIBCAGE
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:18 am
Location: Somewhere underneath Hollywood Blvd.

Postby WinslowLeach on Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:54 pm

Cmon get those noses up there as far as they can go!! LMAO!!
User avatar
WinslowLeach
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 4079
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 2:39 pm
Location: The Deuce

Postby Adam Balm on Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:21 pm

But Winslow, this is all stuff we've said before in the Hulk review threads. We like the movie. Mori likes it too. I wouldn't call that brown-nosing.

The simpering, sycophantic PMs I send him on the other hand, now that's brown-nosing.
Image
User avatar
Adam Balm
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 10806
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: factored in this happening when it has happened

Postby WinslowLeach on Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:33 pm

Im JK. :)
User avatar
WinslowLeach
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 4079
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 2:39 pm
Location: The Deuce

Postby Adam Balm on Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:42 pm

i'm not. :oops:
Image
User avatar
Adam Balm
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 10806
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: factored in this happening when it has happened

Postby Andre Dellamorte on Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:51 pm

And the film spells it out in its way too, with the first mental door the Hulk bursts out of being the door behind which his mother was killed, etc. etc. I was on Chud defending Temple of Doom and it made me want to watch it, and now I can't wait to go home and throw on some Hulk. Shit. Not enough hours in the day. Especially when you say you'll watch the new DC of ALEXANDER. Cock.
Busting makes me feel good.
User avatar
Andre Dellamorte
TOMBOY BEANPOLE
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Los Angeles, Ca.

Postby Lord Voldemoo on Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:59 pm

Adam Balm wrote:The simpering, sycophantic PMs I send him on the other hand, now that's brown-nosing.


BACK OFF BITCH, HE'S MINE!!!!!

Image

best use of company resources EVAR!
Image
User avatar
Lord Voldemoo
He Who Shall Not Be Milked
 
Posts: 17645
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 1:18 pm
Location: Pasture next to the Red Barn

Postby Adam Balm on Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:04 pm

Lord Voldemoo wrote:
Adam Balm wrote:The simpering, sycophantic PMs I send him on the other hand, now that's brown-nosing.


BACK OFF BITCH, HE'S MINE!!!!!

Image

best use of company resources EVAR!


Personally I always put in a 'maybe' box, to take the sting out of possible rejection.

Just ask Bluebottle. :oops:
Image
User avatar
Adam Balm
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 10806
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: factored in this happening when it has happened

Postby Moriarty on Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:10 pm

Andre Dellamorte wrote:And the film spells it out in its way too, with the first mental door the Hulk bursts out of being the door behind which his mother was killed, etc. etc. I was on Chud defending Temple of Doom and it made me want to watch it, and now I can't wait to go home and throw on some Hulk. Shit. Not enough hours in the day. Especially when you say you'll watch the new DC of ALEXANDER. Cock.


Yeah, as soon as LONELINESS OF THE LONG-DISTANCE RUNNER is done, ALEXANDER is next up in the player.

I'm alternately scared and thrilled because at the very least, I know that Rosario Dawson scene's coming sometime in the next three hours.
User avatar
Moriarty
BOMB IN RIBCAGE
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:18 am
Location: Somewhere underneath Hollywood Blvd.

Postby Andre Dellamorte on Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:22 pm

There are two good things about that movie.
Busting makes me feel good.
User avatar
Andre Dellamorte
TOMBOY BEANPOLE
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Los Angeles, Ca.

Postby Leckomaniac on Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:07 am

Lord Voldemoo wrote:
Adam Balm wrote:The simpering, sycophantic PMs I send him on the other hand, now that's brown-nosing.


BACK OFF BITCH, HE'S MINE!!!!!

Image

best use of company resources EVAR!


Oh man Voldemoo that made me laugh. Thank you.

And as for Hulk...I couldn't agree more. That movie gets a bad rap and I can't for the life of me understand why. It had depth, creativity, action, adventure...

I mean seriously. The Hulk has always been a complex psychological character. That is when he is at his best.
Image
User avatar
Leckomaniac
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 11031
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

PreviousNext

Return to DVD / Blu-ray

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron