The Simpsons Movie

Anime, cartoons and 3D. Animated shorts and features. And don't forget the animation genius in Bulgaria.

mmm...

Beer
7
27%
Forbidden Donut
1
4%
Chocolate
2
8%
Sprinkles
4
15%
Candy
1
4%
64 slices of American Cheese
4
15%
Free goo
0
No votes
Something
1
4%
Slanty
0
No votes
Incapacitating
1
4%
Sacrilicious
5
19%
 
Total votes : 26

Postby Chairman Kaga on Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:02 pm

If they don't start this movie with a theatrical full length Itchy and Scratchy cartoon like the WB shorts of old I think they are truly missing out on a great opportunity.
Chairman Kaga
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 7660
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:49 am

Postby RogueScribner on Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:08 pm

Chairman Kaga wrote:If they don't start this movie with a theatrical full length Itchy and Scratchy cartoon like the WB shorts of old I think they are truly missing out on a great opportunity.


I concur!


BTW, what do you figure the rating will be? PG? PG-13?
My eye isn't lazy; it's ambidextrous!
User avatar
RogueScribner
The Dork Avenger
 
Posts: 9609
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:52 am
Location: Melbourne, FL

Postby Chairman Kaga on Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:18 pm

If they can fit some moderating swearing in and keep the dialogue funny I figure they will make it a PG-13 but I don't think they will simply jam harsher language in there if it isn't somehow "funnier".
Chairman Kaga
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 7660
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:49 am

Postby RogueScribner on Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:20 pm

I wasn't thinking language so much as certain situations they may pursue. Meh, it'll probably be PG. The Simpsons isn't exactly known for being hardcore. :P
My eye isn't lazy; it's ambidextrous!
User avatar
RogueScribner
The Dork Avenger
 
Posts: 9609
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:52 am
Location: Melbourne, FL

Postby Chairman Kaga on Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:23 pm

Yeah i did not consider "situations". What the MPAA considers acceptable seems to be fluctuating a bit lately. I guess the studio would shoot for a PG-13 if the plot really pushed something that the MPAA considered edgy.
Chairman Kaga
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 7660
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:49 am

Postby Amy88 on Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:13 pm

Will the same team be doing the music? I love it when they break into song.
Amy88
GLIB
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 6:38 pm

Postby RogueScribner on Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:27 pm

Will they spring for Danny Elfman to do the score, or stick with Alf Clausen? Questions, questions.
My eye isn't lazy; it's ambidextrous!
User avatar
RogueScribner
The Dork Avenger
 
Posts: 9609
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:52 am
Location: Melbourne, FL

Postby buster00 on Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:20 am

Bumped in light of the piece from the main site containing WORK-IN-PROGRESS CLIPS from the upcoming film, as shown at the Con!

And the spirited TalkBack therein...

Me, I think it's gonna be hi-friggin-larious! Check out the clips before Fox torches 'em off the YouTube!
User avatar
buster00
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 6401
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:12 pm

Postby Chairman Kaga on Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:22 am

I love the animatic.
Chairman Kaga
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 7660
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:49 am

Postby MiltonWaddams on Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:45 am

When the Family Guy came back, I thought "I hope it's not all changed". Then I watched an episode and thought "Oh good, it's still the same.". Then 5 more episodes.. and it's still the same. Then three more, and it's still the same.

People aren't saying the Simpsons isn't as funny because that's the trendy thing to do (WTF DOES THAT EVEN MEAN), they're saying it's not as funny because it's just not as funny. You used to tune in knowing it will be a great episode, not hoping it won't suck. Everybody takes that too far, with everybody assuming that all of the new episodes are absolutely worthless, they're not. They're just not the comedy gold that we used to rely on for so many years.

Also, I hope the movie is the end of the Simpsons, finish when you have some dignity.
Urer yvrf Z.J.
Xvyyrq ol ungr naq vafvqr wbxrf.
MiltonWaddams
REAL DRAGON
 
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:31 pm

Postby Proinsias on Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:39 am

The Ginger Man wrote:
RogueScribner wrote:Which shows will stand the test of time? South Park is too topical to still be enjoyable in another 10 years (unless you get the references). Family Guy is a simple show. You know exactly what you're gonna get with it and it may enjoy an extended life in syndication 10 years from now.

But The Simpsons? It will always be on and it will always be watched. It's humor is often stupid, but hardly ever crass or mean-spirited (though my favorite episode is the Frank Grimes one!). Families can watch it together while they eat dinner. The show is enjoyed by all ages, whereas SP and FG have more focused audiences.

50 years from now, people will still know The Simpsons, just like people nowadays know I Love Lucy and The Honeymooners. Will they know Family Guy and South Park?


I think South Park will be remembered 50 yrs from now. Family Guy? I give it 2 more years before the rest of Hollywood gets fed up with Seth McFarlane ripping off their work, word for word....and then they will eat him alive, absorbing him back into the collective concious that is the primordial ooze of L.A.

But South Park, if anything, evolved what Simpsons created. And sure it's almost too topical, but so is the Daily Show and it will be remember for years to come as evolving how most young Americans get their news. Plus, Parker and Stone do a good job of mixing "normal" episodes in every season. Anyone remember "Ginger Kids?"

When all is said and done, I think SP will very much be remembered in 50 yrs, right beside The Simpsons. Not only that, but I believe Eric Cartman will be remembered as one of the great American cartoon characters. He is the modern day Archie Bunker, only taken to insane, sadistic extremes. He embodies all that's evil and ignorant in America, and he's only in the 4th grade. And, he will have your parents killed, then trick you into eating them just b/c you fooled him out of 10 bucks.

Things like this are remembered forever.


(Cartman voice) Hyar ! Hyar!
Proinsias
REAL DRAGON
 
Posts: 425
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 5:30 am
Location: Surveillance Central

Postby AtomicHyperbole on Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:55 am

The animatic is SUPERB. They're obviously animating overseas as it's basically keyframed out completely. No stone left unturned. It was like this on The Cramp Twins... completely insane to work on, but it really gave total control over what the director wanted. The timing is first-rate as usual, and I swear I saw the hand of the friend of mine who's working on it. Dammit, I'd love to work on that... ok, the last thing I did (see sig) was a bit insane. So that's something.
Image
User avatar
AtomicHyperbole
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 7438
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:30 am

Postby Doc Holliday on Thu Jul 27, 2006 7:59 am

The Simpsons still has its moments fools! Done better than any other show to reign as supreme as it did for as long as it did.

I won't be seeing it in a theatre - but most likely will pick up the DVD. Who knows - maybe the longer format will give it a fresh lease of life. At the very least all the ancillary characters will get a better chance to shine - to this day one of my fave Simpsons episodes ever was that collection of shorts about all the background characters. I'm looking forward to some good Skinner, Comic-Book Guy, Frink, Mo Barney and Krusty beats.

The Beavis and Butthead movie was good - and their stock had been dropping way before that movie got made (after considerably fewer seasons too)
"I think the worst time to have a heart attack is during a game of charades..."

Demetri Martin
User avatar
Doc Holliday
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 6434
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:11 am
Location: Crawling along a razor's edge

Postby Shane on Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:15 am

The last couple seasons have been less than impressive. I hope they do pull this off. Part of me likes the idea, part of me thinks it is over and dead, and this is just beating a dead horse. I hope it is great.
User avatar
Shane
AIRWOLF
 
Posts: 2476
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:28 pm
Location: Kansas City

Postby Fried Gold on Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:55 am

John Schwarzwelder is involved again. This is a good thing.
User avatar
Fried Gold
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 13930
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Location: ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░

Postby unikrunk on Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:59 am

Did anyone find anything in either of the clips to be funny?

I did not see anything that merits 'Movie'. It just looked a like another lame episode of a very tired and floundering series.

/now a Futurama movie, on the other hand...
He can't' love you back...
Image
User avatar
unikrunk
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 4845
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:48 am

Postby ThisIsTheGirl on Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:18 am

Doc Holliday wrote: At the very least all the ancillary characters will get a better chance to shine - to this day one of my fave Simpsons episodes ever was that collection of shorts about all the background characters. I'm looking forward to some good Skinner, Comic-Book Guy, Frink, Mo Barney and Krusty beats.


Damn right - and bring back Disco Stu!!!!
User avatar
ThisIsTheGirl
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5689
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:42 am
Location: London, England

Postby Fried Gold on Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:08 pm

Disco Stu.....doesn't advertise.
User avatar
Fried Gold
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 13930
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Location: ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░

Postby RaulMonkey on Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:15 pm

unikrunk wrote:Did anyone find anything in either of the clips to be funny?

I did not see anything that merits 'Movie'. It just looked a like another lame episode of a very tired and floundering series.

/now a Futurama movie, on the other hand...


The whole thing seemed funnier to me because of the Con audience laugh track. That's something they should seriously consider a la certain seasons of THE FLINTSTONES.
Image
User avatar
RaulMonkey
ZONE AMBASSADOR
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:12 am
Location: YYC

Postby tfactor on Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:38 pm

"why does everything I whip end up leaving me?"

ihomerilash

Hey listen I may not see this movie while its in theatres and I may not pay for it on DVD, but on sundays you can buy any two foot long subway subs and get a 3rd one FOR FREE! only at participating subway location and not valid with any other coupon, gift cards or senior citizen discount.

just thought you should know :P

EDIt: edited for raul :wink:
Last edited by tfactor on Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
tfactor
KING SMARMY
 
Posts: 2754
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 8:45 pm
Location: Gridlock

Postby RaulMonkey on Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:41 pm

tfactor wrote:"why does everything I whip end up leaving me?"

lol

Hey listen I may not see this movie while its in theatres and I may not pay for it on DVD, but on sundays you can buy any two foot long subway subs and get a 3rd one FOR FREE! only at participating subway location and not valid with any other coupon, gift cards or senior citizen discount.

just thought you should know :P LOL


See, it even works in writing--that movie quote seemed funnier because of the ensuing "lol," and I fixed your post so that it seems ten times as hilarious.

LOL
Image
User avatar
RaulMonkey
ZONE AMBASSADOR
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:12 am
Location: YYC

Postby buster00 on Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:53 pm

RaulMonkey wrote:
unikrunk wrote:Did anyone find anything in either of the clips to be funny?

I did not see anything that merits 'Movie'. It just looked a like another lame episode of a very tired and floundering series.

/now a Futurama movie, on the other hand...


The whole thing seemed funnier to me because of the Con audience laugh track. That's something they should seriously consider a la certain seasons of THE FLINTSTONES.


I despise cartoons that have a laugh track. Hanna-Barbera was the worst offender -- not just "Flintstones," but "Scooby-Doo" and half their 70's output.

Who the fuck were they trying to fool? Did they expect us to believe it was drawn in front of a live studio audience?
User avatar
buster00
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 6401
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:12 pm

Postby Chairman Kaga on Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:25 pm

buster is anything with a laugh track good?
Chairman Kaga
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 7660
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:49 am

Postby RogueScribner on Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:34 pm

Looks like I missed out on seeing the vid clips. Oh well.
My eye isn't lazy; it's ambidextrous!
User avatar
RogueScribner
The Dork Avenger
 
Posts: 9609
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:52 am
Location: Melbourne, FL

Postby buster00 on Thu Jul 27, 2006 6:11 pm

Chairman Kaga wrote:buster is anything with a laugh track good?


Oddly enough, porno. Try it sometime!


That and grindhouse-style slasher flix.
User avatar
buster00
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 6401
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:12 pm

Postby Bob Samonkey on Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:23 pm

RogueScribner wrote:Looks like I missed out on seeing the vid clips. Oh well.


Here is one, quickly!!!

And another
Last edited by Bob Samonkey on Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bob Samonkey
Große Fäuste
 
Posts: 8982
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Samonkey Island

Postby Pudie on Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:41 pm

wooo! Thanks bob!
Image
User avatar
Pudie
MAN IN SUIT
 
Posts: 878
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:16 pm
Location: *witty remark*

Postby RogueScribner on Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:05 pm

Thanks for the links, Bob! I actually laughed a couple of times at the mob clip. :)
My eye isn't lazy; it's ambidextrous!
User avatar
RogueScribner
The Dork Avenger
 
Posts: 9609
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:52 am
Location: Melbourne, FL

Postby sleepflower on Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:11 pm

Hmm I am very dubious, Im sure they would choose funny clips to show people. Looks like somew opf the worst for timing and laughs out of any of the simpsons material. The first clip had me feeling I had seen this all before. I want to see something NEW in a movie. I want a MOVIE not a feature lenght episode. I like how the halloween specials were particularly self aware, or even in one episode when they said don't worry, in the next episode iot would be like this never happened.

The second clip didn't do it for me either, but that was all down to timing and the joke felt cheap. I love the simpsons, but I want to see something new and special. They should have done this a long time ago when they had new places to take the show.

Not even sure it was the best idea to have homer as the main character as this seems to be.
The Noblest Pleasure is The Joy of Understanding
sleepflower
AIRWOLF
 
Posts: 1138
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:10 pm

Postby thebostonlocksmith on Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:18 pm

I'll watch it. As long as the rapmaster 3000 is reintroduced

"return to your homes, and to your places of bus-iness-es"
User avatar
thebostonlocksmith
AIRWOLF
 
Posts: 2433
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 7:31 am

Postby RaulMonkey on Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:43 pm

buster00 wrote:
RaulMonkey wrote:[quote= "unikrunk"]Did anyone find anything in either of the clips to be funny?

I did not see anything that merits 'Movie'. It just looked a like another lame episode of a very tired and floundering series.

/now a Futurama movie, on the other hand...


The whole thing seemed funnier to me because of the Con audience laugh track. That's something they should seriously consider a la certain seasons of THE FLINTSTONES.


I despise cartoons that have a laugh track. Hanna-Barbera was the worst offender -- not just "Flintstones," but "Scooby-Doo" and half their 70's output.

Who the fuck were they trying to fool? Did they expect us to believe it was drawn in front of a live studio audience?[/quote]

Maybe they showed the completed episodes to a live audience and recorded their laughter to be overlaid later--that's what they do on sitcoms when they film scenes on location.

Seriously though, I know H-B's shit was bogus, but it doesn't matter if you believe the laughter you're hearing was sincerely inspired by what you're seeing. It's a herd response, and even if you're not actually moved to laughter because all of the people on the track are laughing, it can totally change how you perceive the show--for the better.
Image
User avatar
RaulMonkey
ZONE AMBASSADOR
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:12 am
Location: YYC

Postby Chairman Kaga on Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:02 am

buster00 wrote:
Chairman Kaga wrote:buster is anything with a laugh track good?


Oddly enough, porno. Try it sometime!


That and grindhouse-style slasher flix.

Hmm I that sounds good.
Chairman Kaga
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 7660
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:49 am

Postby Ribbons on Sun Jul 30, 2006 4:00 pm

I confess that laugh tracks on sitcoms actually do make me perceive the show as funnier than it actually is. I watch The Soup on E! every weekend and I had an epiphany the other day that, remove the "crew's" "spontaneous" on-set laughter and the show wouldn't seem nearly as funny.

It's a fine line though. Sitcoms that overplay the laugh track, especially ones that aren't funny at all, are very hard to sit through. Every canned laugh is like fingernails on a chalkboard. In a lot of cases, the show would be better off without it. When there's canned laughter after every mundane sentence or slightly witty remark you start to think "You wanted me to laugh at THAT? Yikes."
User avatar
Ribbons
SQUARE PEG
 
Posts: 13979
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:00 am

Postby Al Shut on Sun Jul 30, 2006 4:11 pm

My anticipation for this dropped to the deepest bottoms of hell. The actress that did the German voice of Marge died and getting used to a new one after watching the show for more than my half lifetime will be almost impossible.
Note to myself: Fix this image shit!
User avatar
Al Shut
THE LAUGHING ZONER
 
Posts: 6226
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: Oberhausen, Germany

Postby unikrunk on Sun Jul 30, 2006 4:45 pm

RaulMonkey wrote:Maybe they showed the completed episodes to a live audience and recorded their laughter to be overlaid later--that's what they do on sitcoms when they film scenes on location.

Seriously though, I know H-B's shit was bogus, but it doesn't matter if you believe the laughter you're hearing was sincerely inspired by what you're seeing. It's a herd response, and even if you're not actually moved to laughter because all of the people on the track are laughing, it can totally change how you perceive the show--for the better.


If the rest of the movie is as funny as those clips, they ought to use a track that makes it seem like the rest of the viewing audience is actually laughing; that way, if you don't laugh, you will feel like you just don't 'get it'.
He can't' love you back...
Image
User avatar
unikrunk
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 4845
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:48 am

Postby Fried Gold on Sun Aug 06, 2006 3:54 pm

RogueScribner wrote:Will they spring for Danny Elfman to do the score, or stick with Alf Clausen? Questions, questions.


IMDB and Wikipedia (not always to be trusted, I know) say Hans Zimmer is doing the score.
User avatar
Fried Gold
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 13930
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Location: ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░

Postby Eunuch Provocateur on Mon Aug 07, 2006 5:04 am

Hans Zimmer? Great. Overblown action score with one central theme for the Simpsons.
There's no Devil, just God when he's drunk. -Tom Waits.
Eunuch Provocateur
PRIMITIVE SCREWHEAD
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:14 am

Postby Pacino86845 on Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:30 am

dimnix wrote:I did a search for a simpsons movie thread, didn't find one.

http://www.apple.com/trailers/fox/thesimpsonsmovie/trailer/

It's alright.

But I've gotta say, I love the initial stuff with the wrecker ball, the dumb grin on Homer's face, the ball starting to swing back, and the sad understanding look that quickly replaces the smile. Love it.
User avatar
Pacino86845
EGYPTIAN LOVER
 
Posts: 14064
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:20 am

Postby Jonathan Adams on Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:56 am

I think its pretty obvious that these clips are more about letting people know that there IS a Simpsons movie being made, and not to tell everyone what its about. The production is being VERY tight-lipped about plot details at this point, and for good reason, so I don't think its valid to make any conclusions at all based on these clips.

That said, I think its kinda funny. Its slapstick Simpsons, not the political and social satire Simpsons, and thats OK. I remain confident that with the amazing writing staff and David Silverman directing, this film will be a huge success.

But the Hans Zimmer thing I just do.not.get. Danny Eflman should have had the job, and if he didn't want it it should have been Alf. Oh well. Hope thats thier biggest mistake.
Jonathan Adams
PRIMITIVE SCREWHEAD
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 8:20 am
Location: Australia

Postby AtomicHyperbole on Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:56 am

I both pamped and lashed.
Image
User avatar
AtomicHyperbole
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 7438
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:30 am

Postby RogueScribner on Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:59 am

I think that clip is from the movie since Homer mentioned saving Marge and the kids. I liked it. I'm not prepared to call it genius, but it was funny and I'm crossing my fingers that the movie is good. I'm an old school Simpsons fan and it'd be cool if this movie was something other than a way to milk the franchise some more.
My eye isn't lazy; it's ambidextrous!
User avatar
RogueScribner
The Dork Avenger
 
Posts: 9609
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:52 am
Location: Melbourne, FL

Postby brendonconnelly on Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:50 am

There's now a UK exlcusive trailer. Check it out.
brendonconnelly
MONKEY BUTLER
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:51 am
Location: Oxford, England

Postby thatsfunny on Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:03 pm

all i want in life is for Frank Grimes to make an appearance in this film
thatsfunny
PRIMITIVE SCREWHEAD
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 12:52 pm

Postby godzillasushi on Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:05 pm

thatsfunny wrote:all i want in life is for Frank Grimes to make an appearance in this film


But he's dead....
ImageImage
Image
User avatar
godzillasushi
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Destroying Sony Headquarters in Japan

Postby Fried Gold on Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:18 pm

brendonconnelly wrote:There's now a UK exlcusive trailer. Check it out.


I can't get that video to work, but I may have already seen it. Is it the one with Homer on the roof hammering?
User avatar
Fried Gold
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 13930
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Location: ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░

Postby thatsfunny on Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:20 pm

he may be dead, but i can still hope
thatsfunny
PRIMITIVE SCREWHEAD
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 12:52 pm

Postby godzillasushi on Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:41 pm

You bring up an interesting thought anyway. I wonder how many characters will make an appearance since theres hundreds and they were all so memorable.
ImageImage
Image
User avatar
godzillasushi
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Destroying Sony Headquarters in Japan

Postby thatsfunny on Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:45 pm

yeah, but i also wouldn't want it to just be a cavalcade of random cameos from obscure characters

i'm afraid that might be the temptation though
thatsfunny
PRIMITIVE SCREWHEAD
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 12:52 pm

Postby thatsfunny on Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:47 pm

if there's a scene where disco stu, lurlene, and rex banner show up for no reason, i'm walking out of the theater
thatsfunny
PRIMITIVE SCREWHEAD
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 12:52 pm

Postby godzillasushi on Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:57 pm

Haha Disco Stu MUST be there.
ImageImage
Image
User avatar
godzillasushi
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Destroying Sony Headquarters in Japan

PreviousNext

Return to Animation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron