TheButcher wrote:/film Cool Stuff: Back to the Future 2 Concept Art
Dave McNary wrote:Christopher Lloyd's returning to the topic that made him a star, signing to appear in an Imax film tentatively titled "Time, the Fourth Dimension," produced by 3D Entertainment Films.
3D's Jean-Jacques Mantello ("OceanWorld 3D") and Richard Gabai ("Insight") will co-direct "Time," with a release set for spring 2012.
Much as he did in the "Back to the Future" trilogy, Lloyd will portray an eccentric professor who will explore and explain various dimensions with a focus on space-time.
Pic will include a variety of 3D filmmaking techniques, including special effects, computer-generated images as well as time-lapse and high-speed photography.
"Time, the Fourth Dimension" will have a running time of about 45 minutes. It's part of 3D Entertainment Distribution's recently announced plan to offer 3D films for Imax exhibitors, to be launched next summer with "Air Racers 3D: Forces of Flight" and "Patagonia Wilderness 3D" next fall.
RogueScribner wrote:Eric Stoltz footage to be on Back to the Future Blu-ray!
Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:I can only remember George doing newly scripted stuff for the futuristic stuff. Back in '55 it was entirely stuff from the first film they use, right? Crispin Glover makes it seem as if new scenes/angles were shot for the second movie of him in '55, intercut with '55 stuff from the first film. What gives?
Hermanator X wrote:Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:I can only remember George doing newly scripted stuff for the futuristic stuff. Back in '55 it was entirely stuff from the first film they use, right? Crispin Glover makes it seem as if new scenes/angles were shot for the second movie of him in '55, intercut with '55 stuff from the first film. What gives?
There were new angles and stuff, back in 55, which showed Marty prime in the proximity. Also, he stands there silently at the door, somewhere near the end of the movie, back in the present, and its blatantly a dude in make up.
I watched em a few weeks ago,.
Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:I can only remember George doing newly scripted stuff for the futuristic stuff. Back in '55 it was entirely stuff from the first film they use, right? Crispin Glover makes it seem as if new scenes/angles were shot for the second movie of him in '55, intercut with '55 stuff from the first film. What gives?
Fried Gold wrote:
Fievel wrote:Honestly, the ending of BTTF 1 has always bugged me in the way that he talks about in that interview. I get what they were going for, but I think it would have been a much better film had they just been the same ol' family in the same house/jobs/etc.... just a lot happier.
There was some Creepy Facts About Back To The Future thing somewhere on the internet I read and one of the things was that the family that Marty McFly returns to in 1985 are really complete strangers that he's never met before, which is true. How is that a happy ending?
And I get the gag of making Biff an indentured servant, but really.... wouldn't a really happy ending have been for him to have learned his lesson and to have become a nice guy over the years?
(I know, I know, it wouldn't have served the story..... or the sequels.....)
RogueScribner wrote:It was the '80s. Of course a Reagan-era movie equated money with happiness.
Fried Gold wrote:and doesn't older Biff in BTTF2 revert back from being a subservant to being a bad guy again?
SooperPooperScooper wrote:its only a film stop moaning
Fried Gold wrote:There was some Creepy Facts About Back To The Future thing somewhere on the internet I read and one of the things was that the family that Marty McFly returns to in 1985 are really complete strangers that he's never met before, which is true. How is that a happy ending?
Yeah, I've read about that too. He's created a timeline with entirely different parents, but who apparently happened to have the same/similar children.
TheButcher wrote:Doc Brown Apologizes for 'Back to the Future' Hoverboard Scandal
Lord Voldemoo wrote:TheButcher wrote:Doc Brown Apologizes for 'Back to the Future' Hoverboard Scandal
I think it's real this time.
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/ever-wanted-to-soar-on-a-board-like-marty-mcfly-100566560479.html
Not quite up to Back to the Future standards, yet, but it has potential! Someone shell out $10000 for one of these, please, and then let me play with it.
so sorry wrote:Lord Voldemoo wrote:TheButcher wrote:Doc Brown Apologizes for 'Back to the Future' Hoverboard Scandal
I think it's real this time.
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/ever-wanted-to-soar-on-a-board-like-marty-mcfly-100566560479.html
Not quite up to Back to the Future standards, yet, but it has potential! Someone shell out $10000 for one of these, please, and then let me play with it.
The sound coming out of that thing is horrendous.
Ryan Parker wrote:Of all the futuristic ideas screenwriter Bob Gale came up with for Back to the Future Part II, there is one piece of modern technology he never imagined possible in 1989: the smartphone.
"It's the Swiss Army Knife of today," he said. "The fact that everyone can have one device that's a computer, that's a camera, that's a recording device, that's a calculator, that's a flashlight ... we didn't think of that."
In an interview with THR on the Universal Studios backlot, Gale talked about the future he and director Robert Zemeckis envisioned for their character Marty McFly, who will arrive on Oct. 21, 2015, according to the film.
Some of the ideas for gadgets were just the Oscar-nominated pair goofing around — like the food hydrator — but other inventions Gale knew would be a reality in the not-too-distant future, he said.
Added Gale, "I would have bet that the flat-screen TV and the Skype-like communication — I would have put money that we would have that."
Gale, a co-producer of the trilogy, also knew that people in 2015 would be nostalgic for the '80s, he said. "You're always going to be nostalgic about what happened 30 years ago."
In recent years, there has been a push to develop the technology seen in the film, especially hover boards and power shoelaces. Just in the past week, Pepsi announced it will make a limited-edition bottle from the film, and Universal released a fake trailer for Jaws 19.
Gale is happy his art has inspired reality, but he said he is shocked some inventions that were gags then actually exist now.
"The fact that we have drones that can take news pictures — now that was just a joke," he said. "We weren't seriously thinking about how that technology would work, but wow," said Gale. "They don't walk our dogs yet, but that'll happen."
There was one aspect of the future that Gale and Zemeckis purposely avoided: the music.
"That was a very deliberate choice," said Gale. "That was one we knew we would get wrong and that when people would watch the movie much later on, it would make everyone groan."
Stars Michael J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd never balked at any of the futuristic ideas during production, said Gale.
"Part of what makes the movie still so watchable, even as goofy as some of the stuff is, is that everybody understands that we're having fun with it," said Gale. "We're not saying, 'We're going to seriously try to predict what life is going to be like in the year 2015,' no."
As for the technology Gale wishes existed — that's fusion energy, he said.
"That would mean that we would have limitless energy that would be extraordinarily cheap," he said. "That would solve so many problems in the world, but I don't think that's going to happen."
Now that 2015 has arrived, Gale is thinking about what technology will exist in the next 30 years.
"We've got a serious doctor shortage that is on the horizon," he said, "but when we're able to have devices at clinics or even at home that can instantly analyze your blood, take your vital signs, do a retinal scan right there ... they'll be able to do a better diagnosis with all this equipment than a regular doctor would be able to do."
RaulMonkey wrote:Happy Real BTTFII Day BTW!!
Jack Giroux wrote:According to the film’s co-writer, Bob Gale, there’s a chance more of the Eric Stoltz Back to the Future footage will see the light of day.I’m not going to say never. We did not destroy the footage, because we expect that sometime, in some future anniversary, we may let it get out there. They may see it sometime. I’m not going to say for sure, much less when. But I will say that we had the opportunity to completely destroy it. And we did not. So, it does exist in a vault somewhere.
Most double-dip Blu-ray sets aren’t worth buying, but if the special features on another Back to the Future boxset include more of the original actor’s performance, it’ll be worth the purchase. Gale also had this to say about Stoltz’s serious take on Marty McFly:I have seen all of the Eric Stoltz footage, and we would not be having this conversation! The movie would have been released. But it would not have caught on the way it did. I don’t think it would have been successful enough to make two sequels.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests