I dunno, if I had the chance to do things over, I should have just punched out Brigitte Neillsen and married Ivan Drago. These Q&As about my film life make me feel just like Sly over at AICN right now.
Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:Nah, again, those free floating steadicam running shots were a work of beauty. No Shakin' Stevens gaining new employment as a cameraman here.
AtomicHyperbole wrote:I'm utterly stoked for this film. But I aint saying why, GZS, just to keep you on the edge of your seat.
havocSchultz wrote:tfactor wrote:Teh Bourne Ultimatum trailer is up
Hey, look, more Shaky-Cam goodness!!!
You'd think after all the money the first 2 made - they would be able to afford a fucking tripod or something...
Apparentely, in these movies - Damon is a badass and an expert fighter...
Too bad we'll never know!!!
I saw the first two movies - but I technically didn't see them...
I really dislike the over-use of shaky cameras for action scenes these days...
What happened to the good ole days when directors would actually let us see what was happening on the screen...?
As opposed to trying to convince us it's real and gritty and rough by throwing the camera through the air and editting the footage it captured during said fall into the film...?!?!!?
Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:Oh mate I ain't watching no worldwide eagerly anticipated trailer to a big movie - THAT I'M IN(!!!) in a farking shitty Windows Media Player ZX81 graphiced piece of shite!!! Don't do me no favours guys!! To hell with this! I'll blimmin' wait until the DVD comes out. Oh and thanks for reminding me that I mistakenly told a German chick last night that I was in the Bourne Supremacy and NOT in ULITMATUM like I should have done. Now she's going through the second film trying to find me and getting vertigo out of all the shakycamcrap whilst affording to get herself off whenever she sees someone that DOES look like me and declaring her love for him instead - though she wont have sex with him as she will be complaining of having a headache all the time thanks to the wonder of Shakin' Stevens new employment as DOP of these films and an editor who puts in cuts at the rate of a Havoc piece of bumfluff post.
Yeah and what havoc said about the style of film making these days... In years to come people will look back on this shaky crazy edit and not only will they complain that it was one of the worst times in film making history, but because of all the glorious goings on in front of the camera that was lost due to this current style, they'll be wanting to do EVEN MORE REMAKES of today's films.
magicmonkey wrote:You just haterz! Shaky cam puts you there in the scene, brings immediacy to the events.
havocSchultz wrote:magicmonkey wrote:You just haterz! Shaky cam puts you there in the scene, brings immediacy to the events.
Maybe if you're there and you're Michael J. Fox or something...
Cause usually, when I witness something - my head's not violently shaking around and focusing on everything but what it should be...
MonkeyM666 wrote:How would you guys shoot a fight scene? I'm just curious… I agree with what you're saying but wonder how you guys would do it.
MonkeyM666 wrote:<nods> Nice.... that's a really good idea. really feel the impacts.
and the rest of the fight?
I just told my DP to place the camera in front of the action - and let them go at it. I don't like not being able to see what's happening -so I just wanted a nice wide master shot of these 2 icons completely beating and slashing the hell outta each other...
MonkeyM666 wrote:Cool.... working from a mastershot can be so damn helpful. I like it...
So the next porno you make will be 'Deep Impact', right.... RIGHT??
Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:God, there's alwaaays one isn't there, MM?
Put it this way, and this will end all arguments, to quote Stanley Kubrick "It may be real, but is it any good?" This also coming from a guy that hardly ever employs Michael J Fox to be his shaky cam man and always has his shots in a nice still square non moving manner. Anyway that ain't the point - you're not gonna argue with the Master are you!?!?
EDIT - OI HAVOC!!! Stop stealing my Michael J Fox jokes!! I WROTE THAT FIRST!! NO, I WROTE THAT FIRST!!! IT DON'T MATTER ABOUT THE TIME OF MY POST BEING AFTER HIS!!! I HAD A LOT OF SPELLCHECKING AND COHERENCY WORDCHECKS TO DO ON IT OK!!!!????
Now I say again! Magicmonkey and anyone else! Are you gonna argue with The MASTER!??!!?
MonkeyM666 wrote:How would you guys shoot a fight scene? I'm just curious… I agree with what you're saying but wonder how you guys would do it.
havocSchultz wrote:
And this is what I wrote in there as well...havocSchultz wrote:tfactor wrote:Teh Bourne Ultimatum trailer is up
Hey, look, more Shaky-Cam goodness!!!
You'd think after all the money the first 2 made - they would be able to afford a fucking tripod or something...
Apparentely, in these movies - Damon is a badass and an expert fighter...
Too bad we'll never know!!!
I saw the first two movies - but I technically didn't see them...
I really dislike the over-use of shaky cameras for action scenes these days...
What happened to the good ole days when directors would actually let us see what was happening on the screen...?
As opposed to trying to convince us it's real and gritty and rough by throwing the camera through the air and editting the footage it captured during said fall into the film...?!?!!?
burlivesleftnut wrote:
And this is what I wrote in there as well...havocSchultz wrote:tfactor wrote:Teh Bourne Ultimatum trailer is up
Hey, look, more Shaky-Cam goodness!!!
You'd think after all the money the first 2 made - they would be able to afford a fucking tripod or something...
Apparentely, in these movies - Damon is a badass and an expert fighter...
Too bad we'll never know!!!
I saw the first two movies - but I technically didn't see them...
I really dislike the over-use of shaky cameras for action scenes these days...
What happened to the good ole days when directors would actually let us see what was happening on the screen...?
As opposed to trying to convince us it's real and gritty and rough by throwing the camera through the air and editting the footage it captured during said fall into the film...?!?!!?
Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:But worst of all is that this film just made me wanna rub m eyes as they were so numb and aching but worst than this, editing like this makes me feel so frustrated that I just wanna scream and throw something at the screen.
Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:burlivesleftnut wrote:havocSchultz wrote:
And this is what I wrote in there as well...havocSchultz wrote:tfactor wrote:Teh Bourne Ultimatum trailer is up
Hey, look, more Shaky-Cam goodness!!!
You'd think after all the money the first 2 made - they would be able to afford a fucking tripod or something...
Apparentely, in these movies - Damon is a badass and an expert fighter...
Too bad we'll never know!!!
I saw the first two movies - but I technically didn't see them...
I really dislike the over-use of shaky cameras for action scenes these days...
What happened to the good ole days when directors would actually let us see what was happening on the screen...?
As opposed to trying to convince us it's real and gritty and rough by throwing the camera through the air and editting the footage it captured during said fall into the film...?!?!!?
Are you prone to seizures or something? Do you have Downs Syndrome too? Perhaps you lost track of what the gist of this sentence is by the time you reach this period. Even with the shaky cam, I was able to follow fight scenes in both movies without spazzing out and worrying about what was going on, and I am not even that astute. Perhaps you should pay closer attention. Like reading fundamentals, but watching instead.
And the trailer was just ok. That jump at the end was cool, but not nearly as cool as the "SURPRISE LOL I AM WATCHING YOU WITH A SNIPER SCOPE LOL" moment from the last movie's trailer.
Well I was watching this film real real close man. In fact Iwatched certain scenes twice, the car chase and the fight with the FHM magazine. I watched them with attentive eyes like I was studying something through a microscope. Yes, yo ucan see what is going on, but only JUST ABOUT! I shouldn't have to squint and really really concentrate that hard on simply watching an action scene (the action scenes are normally there so I can concentrate on wtf had just happened in the last plot exposition complicated dialogue bit whilst I watch some kick ass action). But even though I could just about keep up with the action, something is definitely wrong when the amount of edits to a car chase actually make the car chase feel actually SLOWER than it really is, or still not know who was hitting who in that punch up scene too. But worst of all is that this film just made me wanna rub m eyes as they were so numb and aching but worst than this, editing like this makes me feel so frustrated that I just wanna scream and throw something at the screen. Now when you consider all of this, how can that be good editing?
seppukudkurosawa wrote:Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:But worst of all is that this film just made me wanna rub m eyes as they were so numb and aching but worst than this, editing like this makes me feel so frustrated that I just wanna scream and throw something at the screen.
I get a pretty similar reaction whenever I read one of your posts.
![]()
burlivesleftnut wrote:I think it might be an issue with your brain. Perhaps you write so incoherently because you see the world incoherently. Perhaps if I pounded you with a rolled up magazine on your head it might straighten you right out.
burlivesleftnut wrote:But seriously. The only people I ever hear complain about shaky cam and Bourne fight scenes are people on internet movie boards. So please, go on complaining while the producers, actors, writers and director make this the best espionage franchise ever.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests