



Fievel wrote:I find Deep Impact to be a very good disaster film whereas Armageddon is simply an inflated turd of epic proportions.
At least Deep Impact had the balls to actually have destruction on Earth. Mayhem rules. But then, as President Morgan Freeman pointed out, the waters receded.

thomasgaffney wrote:Fried Gold wrote:Chilli wrote:I respect Alien technically, but I found it a ridiculously unenjoyable experience to watch. Same with Blade Runner. I can't fault the visuals, but I can fault the fact that both films (to me at least) seem examples of style over any substance, with annoying critics who keep trying to throw subtext into them.
I'd put The Fountain above both of them, a film that (for me) manages to have style and substance, along with awesome visuals. Shit, this'll get hate but I'd put Alien IV above Alien. Not as a better made film, but as an entertaining experience.
For the first time in two years I'm putting aside the "No hate just debate" rule, to point this out as one of the most ridiculous things ever posted on The Zone.
Hahaha! Seconded.

papalazeru wrote:Fievel wrote:I find Deep Impact to be a very good disaster film whereas Armageddon is simply an inflated turd of epic proportions.
At least Deep Impact had the balls to actually have destruction on Earth. Mayhem rules. But then, as President Morgan Freeman pointed out, the waters receded.
Yes. OH YES!!
Thank god there is another believer.

papalazeru wrote:Fievel wrote:I find Deep Impact to be a very good disaster film whereas Armageddon is simply an inflated turd of epic proportions.
At least Deep Impact had the balls to actually have destruction on Earth. Mayhem rules. But then, as President Morgan Freeman pointed out, the waters receded.
Yes. OH YES!!
Thank god there is another believer.




Fievel wrote:papalazeru wrote:F ievel wrote:I find Deep Impact to be a very good disaster film whereas Armageddon is simply an inflated turd of epic proportions.
At least Deep Impact had the balls to actually have destruction on Earth. Mayhem rules. But then, as President Morgan Freeman pointed out, the waters receded.
Yes. OH YES!!
Thank god there is another believer.
Praise be to Tea Leoni and the giant wave - a scene that has more emotion than Ben & Bruce's I-Love-You-fest could ever dream of.

WinslowLeach wrote:Cappy: Bridge on The River.....zzzzzzzzzzzz


Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:WinslowLeach wrote:Cappy: Bridge on The River.....zzzzzzzzzzzz
B.. b... but it's widely regarded unanimously by stuck up know it all critics as one of the best movies of all time evaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!
OH NO!!! What is wrong with us!!!??? We must be really stupid!!!

OK, I've got one that's worse than Chilli liking Domino and disliking Alien:
Chilli wrote:OK, I've got one that's worse than Chilli liking Domino and disliking Alien:
Okay...
First of all, I've praised Alien for how its made. Its a beautiful looking film. But if I don't buy into the story or the characters, I don't see how I can view it as anything other than a disappointment.
Secondly, Domino is a fucking car crash film. No depth whatsoever, but its just stupid enough and just whacky enough to be enjoyable.
Finally, I enjoyed Daredevil more than I enjoyed Spider-Man (not Spider-Man II mind, that rocked.)

darkjedijaina wrote:Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:WinslowLeach wrote:Cappy: Bridge on The River.....zzzzzzzzzzzz
B.. b... but it's widely regarded unanimously by stuck up know it all critics as one of the best movies of all time evaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!
OH NO!!! What is wrong with us!!!??? We must be really stupid!!!
haha. I liked Bridge. But, it was rather boring. Not something I'd watch again.



Chilli wrote:I know, but I have to defend my stupid opinions.
And I agree with you on EFLA. EFNY had better acting, EFLA seemed to have a better pacing.



minstrel wrote:I hate hate HATE HATE anime. All of it, except maybe Tezuka's stuff.
Dragon Ball Z is just ... just ... horrible.

seppukudkurosawa wrote:minstrel wrote:I hate hate HATE HATE anime. All of it, except maybe Tezuka's stuff.
Dragon Ball Z is just ... just ... horrible.
Even Grave of the Fireflies?

Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:Back to the Future 2 is better than Back to the Future 3.
The more I watch 3, the more a sense of whatever, ho humness I get from it. Merely enjoyable. All the wanker critics sight it so highly it seems, partially 'cos it homages Westerns, f*rk off!!!
2 on the other hand, yeah it doesn't have the enjoyable lightness of character spark that 3 has, but the complexity, the cleverness, how they've wringed out all the potential out of it's premise of time travelling back and forth, all those elements overlapping each other and how much of an ongoing spreading complication it makes, plus that it isn't afraid to turn this episide dark and make it more sinister as well, well it's just a far more rewarding movie than 3. These are Time Travel movies, and I just think that working on this level, 2 is the better of all 3 of them, based on this angle.
3 is mostly trying to be a lame western.


minstrel wrote:seppukudkurosawa wrote:minstrel wrote:I hate hate HATE HATE anime. All of it, except maybe Tezuka's stuff.
Dragon Ball Z is just ... just ... horrible.
Even Grave of the Fireflies?
Never seen it. I've heard about it, and it sounds very depressing.
I don't go looking for anime because I hate it. But my roomie has friends who are totally into it, and they used to come over to our place a lot, bringing anime (I'm talking Japanese stuff - stuff that's never been dubbed into English) to watch on our big-screen TV with the volume turned waaaay up WHILE I'M TRYING TO WORK!!!
Ugh. Torture.

minstrel wrote:I hate hate HATE HATE anime. All of it, except maybe Tezuka's stuff.
Dragon Ball Z is just ... just ... horrible.


godzillasushi wrote:Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote:Back to the Future 2 is better than Back to the Future 3.
The more I watch 3, the more a sense of whatever, ho humness I get from it. Merely enjoyable. All the wanker critics sight it so highly it seems, partially 'cos it homages Westerns, f*rk off!!!
2 on the other hand, yeah it doesn't have the enjoyable lightness of character spark that 3 has, but the complexity, the cleverness, how they've wringed out all the potential out of it's premise of time travelling back and forth, all those elements overlapping each other and how much of an ongoing spreading complication it makes, plus that it isn't afraid to turn this episide dark and make it more sinister as well, well it's just a far more rewarding movie than 3. These are Time Travel movies, and I just think that working on this level, 2 is the better of all 3 of them, based on this angle.
3 is mostly trying to be a lame western.
Yea that's funny because you are wrong. I can tell you don't know enough on the subject so just sit back and relax. 2Pay is wrong folks. 2Pay is wrong. It's not Ellen Page quality, but the third movie is the most entertaining and fun. You can sit back and enjoy it. These critics probably know a thing or two. THAT's why they are critics. Because they know good movies when they see them. And critics like homages. Homages are like critic energy drinks. But I don't hold you being wrong against you.
It actually WAS trying to be a lame western though!

minstrel wrote:seppukudkurosawa wrote:minstrel wrote:I hate hate HATE HATE anime. All of it, except maybe Tezuka's stuff.
Dragon Ball Z is just ... just ... horrible.
Even Grave of the Fireflies?
Never seen it. I've heard about it, and it sounds very depressing.
I don't go looking for anime because I hate it. But my roomie has friends who are totally into it, and they used to come over to our place a lot, bringing anime (I'm talking Japanese stuff - stuff that's never been dubbed into English) to watch on our big-screen TV with the volume turned waaaay up WHILE I'M TRYING TO WORK!!!
Ugh. Torture.

minstrel wrote:I hate hate HATE HATE anime. All of it, except maybe Tezuka's stuff.
Dragon Ball Z is just ... just ... horrible.




Lord Voldemoo wrote:Contrary to popular opinion I find The Mummy (1999 version, written/directed by Stephen Sommers...yes, Sommers) to be a fantastically fun adventure movie in the spirit of Indiana Jones.
I should be posting this in the guilty pleasures thread.


Fievel wrote:I hate BTTF3.


godzillasushi wrote:
Fellowship of the Ring was a boring movie.


godzillasushi wrote:Well I don't like 90% of Pixar movies. I put Toy Story and the wonderful Ratatouille above everything else animated. And you know what, I like Surf's Up even more then those other Pixar movies. Not that Pixar aren't great story tellers but most of the time their stuff doesn't click with me.
I like Ocean's Twelve more then Eleven and Thirteen. I like it's style. It's a different movie in ever way.
And Planet Terror is much better then Death Proof IMO.
Phone Booth was a good movie...
Fellowship of the Ring was a boring movie.



LaDracul wrote:I can understand there's probably a reason for Flitwick looking younger (I'm thinking he had a midlife crisis and decided to make himself look a few hundred years younger),
Chilli wrote:First of all, I've praised Alien for how its made. Its a beautiful looking film. But if I don't buy into the story or the characters, I don't see how I can view it as anything other than a disappointment.
godzillasushi wrote:I like Ocean's Twelve more then Eleven and Thirteen. I like it's style. It's a different movie in ever way.
godzillasushi wrote:I think Kill Bill will be the best thing QT ever does and nothing will/has ever come close.

Alien IV over Alien Chilli? Seriously?
DinoDeLaurentiis wrote:Chilli wrote:First of all, I've praised Alien for how its made. Its a beautiful looking film. But if I don't buy into the story or the characters, I don't see how I can view it as anything other than a disappointment.
That's a the shocking thing a to me, eh? Holy crappa, iffa they did a nothing else with a the picture, they set uppa the story anna the characters, no? How could a you say you dinna buy inna'to it??

Users browsing this forum: brabs, Seppuku, Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest