
buster00 wrote:We Interrupt This Thread For A Special Bulletin From Ultimate Wolverine Vs. Hulk #2 --
Ultimate Wolverine Vs. Hulk #2 is cooler than anything any of us deserve to read this year. And the two motherfuckers aren't even locking fists, despite that tease-ass cover.
We now return you to round-the-clock coverage of TheSumOfGod's ongoing countdown to Ultimates #10.
TheSumOfGod wrote:Ultimates 2 #10 has been CONFIRMED as coming out only 3 days from now, oh joy!![]()
![]()
Carolian wrote:What the holy shitting of a fucker?!?!?
FUCKIN' A! Ohhh man, finally!
And that reminds me, I really have to pick up Ultimate Wolverine vs. Hulk #2, my stupid local shop didn't have it in last Wednesday.
TheSumOfGod wrote:Carolian wrote:What the holy shitting of a fucker?!?!?
FUCKIN' A! Ohhh man, finally!
And that reminds me, I really have to pick up Ultimate Wolverine vs. Hulk #2, my stupid local shop didn't have it in last Wednesday.
SPOILER: Hulk and Wolverine KILL each other at the end of the issue. I have no idea what the last 4 issues are gonna be about, after that.
TheSumOfGod wrote:I was kidding, btw. There's no way in hell they would kill off either Wolvie or Hulk.
JackKnight wrote:Although we still don't have a name for The Colonel or the answer to why he has a big W on his chest.
The Garbage Man wrote:It's a good thing two opposing sides never team up to fight a more powerful (perceived) evil. Especially not in comic books, no sir.
It's also a good thing that all social commentary must be comedic satire.
The Garbage Man wrote:It's neither intelligent nor informed according to your opinion. How nice for you.
Your opinion, however, is not absolute fact. This is The Ultimates, not goddamn Maus. It's meant as entertainment first and foremost, and if it happens to have an allegorical subtext then so much the better.
Adam Balm wrote:Oh dear Garbage Man, you've gone and upset Theta...
And it was almost his nap time...
Colin wrote:Theta, the fact that you use Ellis's work (thankfully not Transmetropolitan) to support your argument throws everything out the window. I've got issues with Millar's writing too, but to compare Ellis to him is like tomato and to-mah-toe.
Theta wrote:1) Europe may not like us, necessarily, but they like the Middle East far far less. Frankly, us walking off with a Middle Eastern country's missile stock wouldn't really bother them.
2) The Middle East is far from a united front. If one country was unilaterally forcibly disarmed, frankly terrorist organizations would be there first thing; it's an ideal training ground and recruiting area. Which promptly turns the country into a warzone.
Theta wrote:3) Apparently, the regular armed forces, the State Department, and the American people are in complete agreement with the Ultimates' actions in Millar's universe. Yeah, Thor has his raver fans but that's really about it for dissent. This wouldn't happen and frankly Millar lost out on a lot of interesting material by ignoring this. Why have "The Liberators" when a good chunk of our own military and government would probably decide this Nick Fury asshole has gone WAY too far? Few military types approve of forcible disarming unless the nation in question is a direct threat to US citizens and soil and we can develop a clear strategy so we're not fighting a very long, involved land war in a country with a population that hates us (you know, Vietnam?)
In fact, one of the things that should have been happening this entire time is Fury fighting to keep his funding after the Hulk debacle. He'd have to be beating off the vultures just to pay the bills on the Triskelion, frankly.
Theta wrote:
To break down my problem with the Ultimates:
1) Europe may not like us, necessarily, but they like the Middle East far far less. It's worth remembering that France and England in particular have had problems with their Muslim populations (mostly because their Christian populations decided Paki-bashing fit in among their country's quaint and charming customs.) Frankly, us walking off with a Middle Eastern country's missile stock wouldn't really bother them; let the imams incite violence against someone ELSE.
2) The Middle East is far from a united front. If one country was unilaterally forcibly disarmed, frankly terrorist organizations would be there first thing; it's an ideal training ground and recruiting area. Which promptly turns the country into a warzone, and usually spreads fighting to other areas. Toss a few Muslim superhumans into the mix (the Colonel is, again, an idea I'm loving) and you could basically have the entire Middle East burning to the ground in a month. One of Millar's great failings was that a story about how the Ultimates unwittingly knock over the dominoes (which is what El Presidente actually did) would have gotten his point across far more effectively.
3) Apparently, the regular armed forces, the State Department, and the American people are in complete agreement with the Ultimates' actions in Millar's universe. Yeah, Thor has his raver fans but that's really about it for dissent. This wouldn't happen and frankly Millar lost out on a lot of interesting material by ignoring this. Why have "The Liberators" when a good chunk of our own military and government would probably decide this Nick Fury asshole has gone WAY too far? Few military types approve of forcible disarming unless the nation in question is a direct threat to US citizens and soil and we can develop a clear strategy so we're not fighting a very long, involved land war in a country with a population that hates us (you know, Vietnam?)
In fact, one of the things that should have been happening this entire time is Fury fighting to keep his funding after the Hulk debacle. He'd have to be beating off the vultures just to pay the bills on the Triskelion, frankly.
Colin wrote:
Loki's behind it all. He's the Trickster God, after all. Notice they never intro'd him in the first pages of #10? As much as I don't really like him, I know Millar's pretty up to date on European and Middle Eastern politics. He knows it could never work. So Loki's his deus ex machina.
It's one way he could have gone. He decided to go a different way. It's his book.
DennisMM wrote:Still want to know how Hawkeye ripped out his fingernails with his fingers when he's tied at the wrists. I know he's got powerful hands, but pushing your nails off with rotary pressure is a bit much.
DennisMM wrote:Still want to know how Hawkeye ripped out his fingernails with his fingers when he's tied at the wrists. I know he's got powerful hands, but pushing your nails off with rotary pressure is a bit much.
Theta wrote:DennisMM wrote:Still want to know how Hawkeye ripped out his fingernails with his fingers when he's tied at the wrists. I know he's got powerful hands, but pushing your nails off with rotary pressure is a bit much.
Loki loosened them for him.
burlivesleftnut wrote:Man Brian Hitch needs to stop drawing Spider-Man. That is is some mind bending anatomy there.
Keepcoolbutcare wrote:burlivesleftnut wrote:Man Brian Hitch needs to stop drawing Spider-Man. That is is some mind bending anatomy there.
Spidey's got a camel-toe.
ewww...
burlivesleftnut wrote:Man Brian Hitch needs to stop drawing Spider-Man. That is is some mind bending anatomy there.
Kilgore wrote:Keepcoolbutcare wrote:burlivesleftnut wrote:Man Brian Hitch needs to stop drawing Spider-Man. That is is some mind bending anatomy there.
Spidey's got a camel-toe.
ewww...
IPAMPILASH!
Apparently, Hitch has rendered Spidey 'as portrayed by Patrick Swayze, circa 1989'...
Theta wrote:Kilgore wrote:Keepcoolbutcare wrote:burlivesleftnut wrote:Man Brian Hitch needs to stop drawing Spider-Man. That is is some mind bending anatomy there.
Spidey's got a camel-toe.
ewww...
IPAMPILASH!
Apparently, Hitch has rendered Spidey 'as portrayed by Patrick Swayze, circa 1989'...
Dumbledore? And with a tiny sack?
Theta wrote:Kilgore wrote:Keepcoolbutcare wrote:burlivesleftnut wrote:Man Brian Hitch needs to stop drawing Spider-Man. That is is some mind bending anatomy there.
Spidey's got a camel-toe.
ewww...
IPAMPILASH!
Apparently, Hitch has rendered Spidey 'as portrayed by Patrick Swayze, circa 1989'...
Dumbledore? And with a tiny sack?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests