Nordling wrote:Kirk, if you think I was talking about you personally, that's something I can't help. I didn't mention names. I wasn't even talking about people in here at all. That's something you're choosing to apply.
No I wasn't. If anything, I was being hypathetical, mayybe I needed to make that more clearer. Your general stance that you took when you made your comment does in theory automatically say that you think your tastes are better than EVERYONE though, but that includes me. Again, in theory. So I wasn't saying that you were talking about me directly.
Nordling wrote: The fact is, and I've seen it mentioned in many countless threads, the people that post in here and other film boards have a distinct sense that their tastes are better than the masses. Otherwise, what's the point in talking about many classic films we've seen? Most people on the street or at a party aren't going to discuss them in general. This is a place meant precisely to talk about your taste in film. I never meant it to mean anyone in here. That's self-application.
Well again, your comment was about your tastes compared to EVERYONE so what are we supposed to think that that comment doesn't apply to us? 'Everyone' the word, does include us, does it not? I don't get what you were trying to originally say now. With the explanation above it looks contradictory.
I dunno from my own personal self. I meet people outside of this place all the time. You'd be so suprised how similar their tastes are to ours. We're not the only people who think we appreciate film history or world cinema or any other factor that we'd think would make us movie buffs or movie geeks. There's loads more of people like us out there.
Also, there's loads of people who do like stuff that I'd consider crap. BUT, here's the thing, I APPRECIATE why they think that, even if I disagree with it. But it doesn't go really anymore beyond that.