darkjedijaina wrote:It's a polarizing movie, just as The Fountain was. If you like movies that have a depth to them that most people don't care to look at or grasp and don't have a problem with them re-doing songs of The Beatles to do so, then by all means, see the movie. Go. Now. If not, wait for it.
junesquad wrote:darkjedijaina wrote:It's a polarizing movie, just as The Fountain was. If you like movies that have a depth to them that most people don't care to look at or grasp and don't have a problem with them re-doing songs of The Beatles to do so, then by all means, see the movie. Go. Now. If not, wait for it.
I enjoyed one half of it... it was just the drug trips that seemed to kill it for me. It seemed to jar me out of the movie and keep me disoriented/confused. I thought that maybe this was their intentions, but I just couldn't get comfortable. I loved the love story in it though.
darkjedijaina wrote:junesquad wrote:darkjedijaina wrote:It's a polarizing movie, just as The Fountain was. If you like movies that have a depth to them that most people don't care to look at or grasp and don't have a problem with them re-doing songs of The Beatles to do so, then by all means, see the movie. Go. Now. If not, wait for it.
I enjoyed one half of it... it was just the drug trips that seemed to kill it for me. It seemed to jar me out of the movie and keep me disoriented/confused. I thought that maybe this was their intentions, but I just couldn't get comfortable. I loved the love story in it though.
i didn't find them to be confusing at all. it was just a visual feast of what was really happening within the characters as well as the story at the time. for instance, on Strawberry Fields Forever, Jude is struggling with his anger. He's not sure if their love is real or not. And Max is struggling with the war. So it intertwines the two, unsure of what is real. Imagine being in that war, you wouldn't know what was real as far as sounds you heard. It could just be an animal in the brush, or it could be an enemy soldier. When it shows the naked Asian women falling into the water, that's what it must've looked like to Max, seeing those bodies that he had killed. I dunno, I just thought that the drug induced scenes were meant to show you a deeper side of what was going on, in the same way that art does.
darkjedijaina wrote:It's a polarizing movie, just as The Fountain was. If you like movies that have a depth to them that most people don't care to look at or grasp and don't have a problem with them re-doing songs of The Beatles to do so, then by all means, see the movie. Go. Now. If not, wait for it.
darkjedijaina wrote:you talk about the one scene with them carrying the statue of liberty. to me, that represented the current "advancement of democracy" which is a reflection of what once was. sure, the song may not have anything to do with it, but she took it to a deeper level there. something the beatles may or may not have intended, but that's the beauty of art. it means something different to each person that looks at it. take a picasso. it has varying degrees and held up to the light it can look a different way to some. if it doesn't jive with you, then it doesn't.
Will Scarlet wrote:Was forced into renting this by Beatle and 60's fans in the house. I wanted to kill myself. There wasn't a breath between songs. I'm sorry, but I can't think of anything good to say about this....this...waste of film and bastardization of Beatles music. There was nothing even remotely as thought provoking as the Fountain in this screenplay. I have to agree with the earlier advice. Have a bowl handy for vomiting into. Better yet, save your money and and your brain and don't see it at all.
W.S.
Bob Poopflingius Maximus wrote:So she is an Elvis fan...?
DaleTremont wrote:Someone's hate to rival my own!
I was thinking about renting this to give it another shot. But I don't know if I could stand it.
I love musicals, but to me this is the perfect example of why people hate them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests