ONE MORE DAY: Love It or Loathe It?

Graphic novels. Weekly rags. The @$$holes.

ONE MORE DAY/BRAND NEW DAY: How do you feel?

Like it.
0
No votes
Not sure what to feel.
0
No votes
Hate it but will continue reading Spider-man.
2
33%
Hate it and will stop reading Spider-man til they undo the events.
4
67%
 
Total votes : 6

Postby MasterWhedon on Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:08 pm

I want to slap the shit out of whichever @$$hole conducted that interview. Those guys bitch more than anyone about Marvel, but when it comes time to interview two of the guys responsible for the new scuttlebutt, they ask the same bland, generic questions that have already been asked by twenty other sites.

Where's the in-your-face, hard-hitting, muck-raking take-it-to-'em?

:roll:
User avatar
MasterWhedon
KEEPER OF THE PURSE
 
Posts: 9473
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:07 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby Leckomaniac on Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:25 pm

MasterWhedon wrote:I want to slap the shit out of whichever @$$hole conducted that interview. Those guys bitch more than anyone about Marvel, but when it comes time to interview two of the guys responsible for the new scuttlebutt, they ask the same bland, generic questions that have already been asked by twenty other sites.

Where's the in-your-face, hard-hitting, muck-raking take-it-to-'em?

:roll:


I find the @$$holes to be some of the worst reviewers and worst reporters on the web. AICN comics coverage is laughable.
Image
User avatar
Leckomaniac
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 11031
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Postby DennisMM on Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:38 pm

They are assholes. What should we expect?


ETA: They should consider asking some of the Zoners to contribute to the comics coverage.
Last edited by DennisMM on Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DennisMM
NOT PARTICULARLY MENACING
 
Posts: 16808
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Watchin' the reels go 'round and 'round

Postby WalterBunny on Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:41 pm

MasterWhedon wrote:Where's the in-your-face, hard-hitting, muck-raking take-it-to-'em?

:roll:


Damn the liberal media!!!

Okay, I admit, I got nothin'.
Image
User avatar
WalterBunny
STEAK-A-BABY
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:14 am
Location: Flying over Japan

Postby Leckomaniac on Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:14 am

DennisMM wrote:They are assholes. What should we expect?


ETA: They should consider asking some of the Zoners to contribute to the comics coverage.


You are 1000x the writer that any of them are. Dennis, you should totally be contributing to AICN.
Image
User avatar
Leckomaniac
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 11031
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Postby burlivesleftnut on Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:41 am

I hate those creeps.
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby Leckomaniac on Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:44 am

burlivesleftnut wrote:I hate those creeps.


I want to be on a comic book panel with Burl and Dennis. Oh the good times we would have. Much more entertaining than those guys from The Stack or whatever on Newsarama.
Image
User avatar
Leckomaniac
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 11031
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Postby burlivesleftnut on Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:50 am

Nah, we are creeps too.
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby bluebottle on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:17 am

burlivesleftnut wrote:I just read BND, and *gulp* I really liked it. I am still peaved at the shear stupidity of OMD, but if you can divorce yourself from that, then it's a pretty fun ride. I still don't get why Pete thinks 30 is too young to get married... maybe he was just lying to cover up his fear of committment. Just skip the May story and the Osbourne story... YAWNS.


I don't know you.
User avatar
bluebottle
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Canada

Postby burlivesleftnut on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:24 am

god damn it! there goes my last friend.
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby Leckomaniac on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:36 am

burlivesleftnut wrote:god damn it! there goes my last friend.


But...but...

what about our comic book panel*?!?!?! I THOUGHT WE WERE CLOSE!!!!




*it only exists in my mind.
Image
User avatar
Leckomaniac
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 11031
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Postby burlivesleftnut on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:39 am

*leaves quietly*
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby Leckomaniac on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:40 am

burlivesleftnut wrote:*leaves quietly*


I honestly don't blame you.
Image
User avatar
Leckomaniac
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 11031
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Postby bluebottle on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:43 am

LOL
User avatar
bluebottle
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Canada

Postby The Garbage Man on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:43 am

MasterWhedon wrote:
Bluebottle wrote:Yeah , but you're just looking at the small picture, and not what's really going on...

How would you like it if all the X-Men titles were erased, and First Class became the main 616 book?

Would you be thrilled if they destroyed all of Scott Summer's development from the last 30 years?

The truth of the matter is I have HUGE problems with the way mainstream comic books refuse to allow their characters to grow and change in significant ways. I quite honestly don't know if I could ever write for one of the "core" titles because all I'd be interested in doing is shifting the status quo, making character arcs where at the end our hero is vastly different than he was at the start.

But that's not how Marvel and DC operate, for better or worse.

I completely understand the frustration in the idea that years and years of continuity--fan-purchased continuity--are suddenly swept away, but I think Joe Q is right in that at some point Spider-Man veered a little too far away from the original mission statement. He grew up, got a job, got married... and suddenly he was Peter Banning when he should've stayed Peter Pan. Making some sort of "fix" to take things back closer to the original idea without having to reboot the entire universe to do it is a big, ballsy move--and I still think it's the right one.

And, yes, I suppose I would be a great deal more pissed if they had done this with the X-Men. (If that makes me a hypocrite, then it's one of a great many things to do so.) But Joe Q & Co. already put the "fix" on the mutant world by radically decreasing the number of mutants, getting the X-books back to their place as outcasts. That was the right call to make, as otherwise the X-Men were and are still very close to their original model.

Maybe I sound a little confused: "I wouldn't work this way, but he's right to do so." But that's just how I feel. Joe Q will be gone within the next few years, no doubt, and all he's trying to do is to make sure the Spider-Man he leaves behind hasn't changed so radically that it isn't recognizable to new readers who vaguely know Spider-Man. That's his job, and I think he's doing it well. Sucks that it took such a drastic, continuity-scrambling move to do so, but that's what it took.


Holy shit...


Did you just reference Hook?


With a straight face?
User avatar
The Garbage Man
AIRWOLF
 
Posts: 2558
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:27 pm
Location: The Big Blue Velour Marble

Postby Leckomaniac on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:47 am

The Garbage Man wrote:Holy shit...


Did you just reference Hook?


With a straight face?


That made me laugh.
Image
User avatar
Leckomaniac
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 11031
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Postby burlivesleftnut on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:56 am

Hahahahaha
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby DennisMM on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:58 am

I smiled when I realized what he'd said. Good idea, bad movie.
"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." -- Noam Chomsky
DennisMM
NOT PARTICULARLY MENACING
 
Posts: 16808
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Watchin' the reels go 'round and 'round

ONE MORE DAY: Love It or Loathe It?

Postby bastard_robo on Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:24 pm

DAMN YOU ALL AND YOUR HOOK BASHING!
Nobody exists on purpose. Nobody belongs anywhere. Everyone is gonna die. Come watch TV
— Rick and Morty

Image
User avatar
bastard_robo
SCANK BARON
 
Posts: 4636
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:59 am
Location: Hello Kitty Adventure Island

Postby RogueScribner on Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:31 pm

DennisMM wrote:I smiled when I realized what he'd said. Good idea, bad movie.


Exactly. And I really did enjoy Dustin Hoffman's portrayal, even if he is only 4 feet tall. The original script for the movie was a little darker, but they blanded things up real good in the final form. Even so, there are moments of that movie I just love. Sadly, there's a lot of humdrum in between.
My eye isn't lazy; it's ambidextrous!
User avatar
RogueScribner
The Dork Avenger
 
Posts: 9609
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:52 am
Location: Melbourne, FL

Postby burlivesleftnut on Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:02 pm

I think we should make a new rule for the interweb:

When a discussion or idea eventually devolves into byte sized reviews of Hook, said discussion or idea is totally dead.
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby MasterWhedon on Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:47 pm

The Garbage Man wrote:Holy shit...


Did you just reference Hook?


With a straight face?

BWAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

:twisted: :lol: :twisted:
User avatar
MasterWhedon
KEEPER OF THE PURSE
 
Posts: 9473
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:07 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby bluebottle on Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:52 pm

MasterWhedon wrote:
The Garbage Man wrote:Holy shit...


Did you just reference Hook?


With a straight face?

HHAARRR HARRR HARR ARRRRRRRRRARRR MATEY!!!

:twisted: :lol: :twisted:


:)
User avatar
bluebottle
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Canada

Postby DennisMM on Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:25 pm

Over at the main site, the @$$holes - aw, fuck that - the ASSHOLES had a round table on "One More Day/Brand New Day." One said what a junior assistant editor should have said to Joe Q - while beating him with a stick and reminding him that he's an artist, not a writer.

HUMPHREY wrote: That's what really seems to bug me about this: you have the superhero character who out of all the big franchise characters is supposed to be the most "relatable", the guy that goes through the same pitfalls we're supposed to see in our lives and overcome like he does. So, when it comes time to finally break off something that apparently the higher ups find a little stifling to storytelling with him, what do they do? They don't deal with it like it tends to happen in real life--that sometimes people just grow apart and can't be together anymore, even though they still deep down love each other. They don't have something like all the recent trauma in Peter's life with his unmasking, constantly being on the run because of the Initiative act, and the shooting of Aunt May cause MJ to finally say she's had enough and can't deal with it anymore... instead we go to a stupid deus ex machina.


The story should have been called "One More Deus."
"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." -- Noam Chomsky
DennisMM
NOT PARTICULARLY MENACING
 
Posts: 16808
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Watchin' the reels go 'round and 'round

Postby burlivesleftnut on Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:50 pm

Oh fuck... the ASSHOLES didn't like it? It must mean I love it more than anything.
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby bluebottle on Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:54 pm

burlivesleftnut wrote:Oh fuck... the ASSHOLES didn't like it? It must mean I love it more than anything.


you know, you can not like it... you're not being disloyal to dan slott.

i'll bet you any money that even he doesn't like it. i'll bet you he thinks, "darn it, all my life i wanted to write for spiderman and now i have to write this shit... darn it!"
User avatar
bluebottle
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Canada

Postby DennisMM on Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:56 pm

He says "shit" but not "damn"? Interesting.

burl, the ASSHOLES mostly agreed with the idea of simplifying Peter's situation but thought it was done very poorly.
"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." -- Noam Chomsky
DennisMM
NOT PARTICULARLY MENACING
 
Posts: 16808
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Watchin' the reels go 'round and 'round

Postby burlivesleftnut on Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:27 pm

bluebottle wrote:
burlivesleftnut wrote:Oh fuck... the ASSHOLES didn't like it? It must mean I love it more than anything.


you know, you can not like it... you're not being disloyal to dan slott.

i'll bet you any money that even he doesn't like it. i'll bet you he thinks, "darn it, all my life i wanted to write for spiderman and now i have to write this shit... darn it!"


Actually I really do like Brand New Day. I have not been feeling a lot of Slott love because She-Hulk turned to shit and The Initiative is a mess. But I am finding his work on BMD to be really well done. More energetic and clever than alot of the stuff he's done before.
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby MasterWhedon on Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:35 pm

Yeah, I'm really digging BND so far. I get that a lot of folks are "voicing" their dissatisfaction with OMD by not buying it, but it's pretty classic Spider-Man and pretty damn good. Despite the means of getting to it, I still say BND is the right place for the book to be, from both business and creative perspectives.

And between buying BND and Messiah Complex every week, I'm hooked on weekly comics. (Still won't try Countdown though...)
User avatar
MasterWhedon
KEEPER OF THE PURSE
 
Posts: 9473
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:07 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby DennisMM on Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:12 pm

You'd need a whole buncha spoilers to catch up, anyway. :)
"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." -- Noam Chomsky
DennisMM
NOT PARTICULARLY MENACING
 
Posts: 16808
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Watchin' the reels go 'round and 'round

Postby bluebottle on Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:42 pm

"hey, are you a casual fan? do you not want to be bothered with all the character development from over the last 30 years? is your spiderman knowledge basically a handful of Stan Lee era books and the Toby McGuire (seabiscuit) films? Then boy have we got the comic for you! It's called ULTIMATE spiderman! But if that's too confusing for you, then we've also flattened regular Spiderman's arc out into one giant straight line! Read Amazing Spiderman #1, then the issue on stands now, and you won't notice a lick of difference!"
User avatar
bluebottle
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Canada

Postby burlivesleftnut on Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:52 pm

Hey that's good copy. Do you mind if I use that to promote Brand New Day on my blog?
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby MasterWhedon on Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:00 pm

bluebottle wrote:"hey, are you a casual fan? do you not want to be bothered with all the character development from over the last 30 years? is your spiderman knowledge basically a handful of Stan Lee era books and the Toby McGuire (seabiscuit) films? Then boy have we got the comic for you! It's called ULTIMATE spiderman! But if that's too confusing for you, then we've also flattened regular Spiderman's arc out into one giant straight line! Read Amazing Spiderman #1, then the issue on stands now, and you won't notice a lick of difference!"

Now you're gettin' it...
User avatar
MasterWhedon
KEEPER OF THE PURSE
 
Posts: 9473
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:07 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby bluebottle on Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:04 pm

:(

i miss MY spiderman.
User avatar
bluebottle
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Canada

Postby DennisMM on Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:05 pm

You may have created a new comics meme with "flattened arc." I'll try to sell it to Warren Ellis. My cut is 20 percent.
"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." -- Noam Chomsky
DennisMM
NOT PARTICULARLY MENACING
 
Posts: 16808
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Watchin' the reels go 'round and 'round

Postby burlivesleftnut on Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:30 pm

bluebottle wrote::(

i miss MY spiderman.


You're incredibly selfish.
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby MasterWhedon on Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:43 pm

burlivesleftnut wrote:
bluebottle wrote::(

i miss MY spiderman.


You're incredibly selfish.

Ergo, kill yourself.
User avatar
MasterWhedon
KEEPER OF THE PURSE
 
Posts: 9473
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:07 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby bluebottle on Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:08 pm

i'm no coward!
User avatar
bluebottle
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Canada

Postby burlivesleftnut on Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:09 pm

Face it, Bulbittl... you just can't accept change. I bet those whole Spider-Mania business has you back on the sauce.

Think of your fucking dog, blue.
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby Spifftacular SquirrelGirl on Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:29 am

MasterWhedon wrote:
bluebottle wrote:"hey, are you a casual fan? do you not want to be bothered with all the character development from over the last 30 years? is your spiderman knowledge basically a handful of Stan Lee era books and the Toby McGuire (seabiscuit) films? Then boy have we got the comic for you! It's called ULTIMATE spiderman! But if that's too confusing for you, then we've also flattened regular Spiderman's arc out into one giant straight line! Read Amazing Spiderman #1, then the issue on stands now, and you won't notice a lick of difference!"

Now you're gettin' it...


I actually prefer Spider-Man Loves Mary Jane but to each their own and you're absolutely right. If Joey Q wanted things back to the way they were why not push Ultimate Spider-Man more?
User avatar
Spifftacular SquirrelGirl
AIRWOLF
 
Posts: 1434
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:58 am
Location: Random tree

Postby bluebottle on Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:37 am

Spider-Man loves Mary Jane is great... And between that and Ultimate Spider-man, there's enough "classic" Spider-Man to go around.
User avatar
bluebottle
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Canada

Postby bluebottle on Sat Jan 26, 2008 7:35 pm

ok, i read the latest issue of ASM, finishing out the first BND arc.

i have to admit, Slott's writing is fantastic and I love McNiven's artwork... it DOES feel like classic spidey again...

damnit.

DAMNIT.

those bastards.

they could have still done this without the retcon...

but i'm in... make mine marvel.
User avatar
bluebottle
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Canada

Postby burlivesleftnut on Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:16 pm

Hahaha SUCKER. We just pretended to like BND to see if you would give in to peer pressure. AND YOU DID.
Image
User avatar
burlivesleftnut
I <3 PACINA
 
Posts: 10626
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Port Angeles, WA

Postby bluebottle on Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:32 pm

bastards.

and i bought a whole lot of copies in case they got valuable too...
User avatar
bluebottle
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Canada

Postby MasterWhedon on Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:25 pm

bluebottle wrote:ok, i read the latest issue of ASM, finishing out the first BND arc.

i have to admit, Slott's writing is fantastic and I love McNiven's artwork... it DOES feel like classic spidey again...

damnit.

DAMNIT.

those bastards.

they could have still done this without the retcon...

but i'm in... make mine marvel.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

:twisted:
User avatar
MasterWhedon
KEEPER OF THE PURSE
 
Posts: 9473
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:07 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby bluebottle on Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:56 pm

yeah, yeah, fuck you...

i was waiting for you to read that...

heh.
User avatar
bluebottle
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Canada

Postby Leckomaniac on Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:05 pm

So, I remained firm in my "I won't buy Amazing Spidey" stance. I will not support Marvel for making an uber shitty story like One More Day just to satisfy some silly editorial wish.

But I did borrow the first three issues of BND to see what was up. And I have to say it was quite good, but the thing is I am not at all convinced it was good because of OMD. More accurately, I think it was good because Dan Slott is a damn fine writer who was born to write Spidey.

The only real changes that made any difference were the return to web shooters and a down on his luck Peter (still not convinced he needed to be single). The return of H@rry is just fucking silly, the new female characters are totally lame, and making no one know Spidey's identity is pretty much a none issue at this point. The bottom line is they should have never had Pete reveal his identity so much in the first place...and they should have NEVER had him unmask in Civil War if they were just going to retcon it like this.

After reading this arc I am more convinced than ever that they could have made minor changes to the character and still made him fresh. No need for Mephisto. No need for magic. What they really needed was a solid writer orchestrating the whole thing and not Joe "I love the Mets" Quesada shoving all these mandates down the writer's throats.

So, in the end, I will still maintain my embargo on Spidey...because BND proves one thing and one thing only: Dan Slott is a damn fine writer who was born to write Spider-Man.
Image
User avatar
Leckomaniac
AIRWOLF PLUS
 
Posts: 11031
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Previous

Return to Comic Books

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron