Shermdawg wrote:Herc didn't publicly say anything, and he shouldn't have to. Like I've told others, if you were banned, email him and see if you can work it out, but any offtopic posting to the extent we were won't be tolerated anymore, and as much as I love the show and discussing it with the talkbackers, it's not worth getting banned over. Should Herc have thrown us a bone and gave the show a talkback? I still say yes. But after talking to him, it's clear that will never happen. So I'm not gonna waste my time asking for one, other than the locked one he said he'd toss up for the finale directing people to this thread. Were we in the wrong in what we were doing? Looking back on it, absolutely. But, I'm assuming it doesn't have as much to do with Lisa and her alts complaints, as it does with the people we kinda spoiled things for in a talkback where they didn't expect or want to stumble upon them. But now, that will no longer be a problem....I'm hoping.
I'm also hoping people that do move over don't make their introduction by questioning why we're here, and jump right into Supernatural talk. I'll be linking my initial post in any talkback posts directing peeps here, there's been more than enough info already explaining the situation, so from this point on, I won't be acknowledging any further discussion on the matter.......that is, unless, in the next episode featuring a certain character named Chuck, this little debacle is somehow parodied.But the chances of that happening are slim and none, so...for me, it ends here.
New episode tomorrow night, I expect this place to be hopping afterwards.
Big Jim wrote:Hey, there really is a Supernatural discussion going on in The Zone. What's the policy on spoilers? I've seen a few posts that look like excerpts from the Watergate tapes; some contain casting information which might result in who is or isn't long for the show, while others seem to mention events from last night's episode. I've always been of the mind that if the episode has aired it is no longer a spoiler and ok to freely mention. Is that ok or do I need to learn how to black-out my text?
V'Shael wrote: ranting about Herc and his decisions here in the Zone isn't acceptable either. (I was politely warned by one of the mods, so I dropped it and calmed down.) Hey, at least the mod here in the Zone gave me a warning first, right?
wixmmm wrote:zone could be better... (not really able to modify this, but) there's not as much conversation, especially after a full day or two (talkbacks stay alive longer)
Also, I wish there was a board for each show, instead of just one topic for each show. First--you wouldn't need to scroll past a thousand posts to find where the new episode discussion happens. Second-- if each show had a board, you could create different topics related to different things about the show to discuss. After a day or two, the conversation about the new episode pretty much dies, but if there were other threads about different topics regarding supernatural, those would last longer. The episode discussion would end, but in the middle of the week someone could post something not directly relating to the newest episode, but it would go unmissed. If there was a board for each show, we could pop into the zone during the week, go to the supernatural board, and immediately notice a new topic for discussion.
I learned HTML in fifth grade, Freshman year of highschool I had taught myself Perl. I also learned how to create high quality cgi messange boards, and more basic message boards with Perl. Perl boards fit nicely into the design of my website, but the cgi ones had their own look, but with more features. The reason I'm saying this is because, it is not hard AT ALL to create sub-message boards. Someone said this once, and I would ask the same question. They said something along the lines of: 'does aintitcool have a shortage of webpages?' A popular site like this, with all the traffic it gets, plus, i'm sure it makes a pretty fair amount of money. Creating sub-message boards would take about an hour, if that, if the programmer was moderately capable.
wixmmm wrote:zone could be better... (not really able to modify this, but) there's not as much conversation, especially after a full day or two (talkbacks stay alive longer)
Also, I wish there was a board for each show, instead of just one topic for each show. First--you wouldn't need to scroll past a thousand posts to find where the new episode discussion happens.
RogueScribner wrote:Herc probably started watching/liking The Office when Joss Whedon directed an episode . . .
Yeah, I was right. The earliest mention of The Office that I can find (other than as a relative reference in another article) is when Joss Whedon was slated to direct an episode. So there ya go.
Seppuku wrote:Considering Hell's meant to have more flames than a Script Girl talkback, I think "torcher" might be quite appropriate.
wixmmm wrote:In the office talkback, he lists 30 rock, office, parks and recreation, and what does he list that's on at 8pm??? Mother Fucking Survivor. He knows when supernatural is on, yet he plugs a old and past its prime REALITY SHOW. Why, WHY would he plug survivor but not supernatural???
Big Jim wrote:wixmmm wrote:In the office talkback, he lists 30 rock, office, parks and recreation, and what does he list that's on at 8pm??? Mother Fucking Survivor. He knows when supernatural is on, yet he plugs a old and past its prime REALITY SHOW. Why, WHY would he plug survivor but not supernatural???
Isn't Supernatural on at 9:00, or is that just where I live?
I have a theory that Herc doesn't do Supernatural talkbacks because it is on opposite The Office, which he does promote.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest