EliCash wrote:that's pretty ALF. those things dont work.
vicious_bastard wrote:I'm confused. Would this mean a studio would put more or less money into the picture, 'knowing' it was going to be a success?
DorkmanScott wrote:vicious_bastard wrote:I'm confused. Would this mean a studio would put more or less money into the picture, 'knowing' it was going to be a success?
Hell no. It means that they'll assume a movie's success is a foregone conclusion and cut the budget down to whatever number gives them the best investment-profit ratio.
DinoDeLaurentiis wrote:Just a the note, eh... Iffa you do go anna see a the movie, donna take a the bambinos, eh? It's a not like a the original Kong, eh?
Remember how when a you were a the bambino anna you parents, they took a you to a my Kong? Anna remember how uncomfortable they were when a the script, she make a the funny about a the "Deep Throat" anna Kong sees Jessie's boobies anna such?
Well they donna do that inna this a movie but HOLY CRAPPA those little bambinos gonna to be scared by alla sorts of a stuff, eh? Nightmares for a sure!
Listen to a your Uncle Dino anna do right by a the bambinos.
DinoDeLaurentiis wrote:That's a the good point, eh Brianiac? The sound inna the movie alone, she is enough a to give a the bambinos a the nightmares, eh?
MasterWhedon wrote:Please be careful about SPOILERS in here, as this is also a forum for folks who haven't seen the film yet. Unless the forum is clearly marked, it's just a common courtesy.
DinoDeLaurentiis wrote:That's a the good point, MasterWhedon... but inna the case of a the Kong squashing the guy, I think a the poster was a referring to my Kong when a the Charlie Grodin, he get a his a, how you say? "comeuppance," eh?
DinoDeLaurentiis wrote:MasterWhedon wrote:Please be careful about SPOILERS in here, as this is also a forum for folks who haven't seen the film yet. Unless the forum is clearly marked, it's just a common courtesy.
That's a the good point, MasterWhedon... but inna the case of a the Kong squashing the guy, I think a the poster was a referring to my Kong when a the Charlie Grodin, he get a his a, how you say? "comeuppance," eh?
TheBaxter wrote:DinoDeLaurentiis wrote:MasterWhedon wrote:Please be careful about SPOILERS in here, as this is also a forum for folks who haven't seen the film yet. Unless the forum is clearly marked, it's just a common courtesy.
That's a the good point, MasterWhedon... but inna the case of a the Kong squashing the guy, I think a the poster was a referring to my Kong when a the Charlie Grodin, he get a his a, how you say? "comeuppance," eh?
Yes, I was, but I was trying to be thoughtful by not mentioning the name of the squashee. But looks like you've gone ahead and spoiled your own film. Damn you again, Dino!
BTW is there an expiration date for spoilers? We all know Bruce Willis is a ghost here, right?
TheBaxter wrote:BTW is there an expiration date for spoilers? We all know Bruce Willis is a ghost here, right?
havocSchultz wrote:TheBaxter wrote:DinoDeLaurentiis wrote:MasterWhedon wrote:Please be careful about SPOILERS in here, as this is also a forum for folks who haven't seen the film yet. Unless the forum is clearly marked, it's just a common courtesy.
That's a the good point, MasterWhedon... but inna the case of a the Kong squashing the guy, I think a the poster was a referring to my Kong when a the Charlie Grodin, he get a his a, how you say? "comeuppance," eh?
Yes, I was, but I was trying to be thoughtful by not mentioning the name of the squashee. But looks like you've gone ahead and spoiled your own film. Damn you again, Dino!
BTW is there an expiration date for spoilers? We all know Bruce Willis is a ghost here, right?
what - a ghost... dammit all to fuck...
TheBaxter wrote:havocSchultz wrote:TheBaxter wrote:DinoDeLaurentiis wrote:MasterWhedon wrote:Please be careful about SPOILERS in here, as this is also a forum for folks who haven't seen the film yet. Unless the forum is clearly marked, it's just a common courtesy.
That's a the good point, MasterWhedon... but inna the case of a the Kong squashing the guy, I think a the poster was a referring to my Kong when a the Charlie Grodin, he get a his a, how you say? "comeuppance," eh?
Yes, I was, but I was trying to be thoughtful by not mentioning the name of the squashee. But looks like you've gone ahead and spoiled your own film. Damn you again, Dino!
BTW is there an expiration date for spoilers? We all know Bruce Willis is a ghost here, right?
what - a ghost... dammit all to fuck...
Yeah, kinda makes you see Die Hard in a whole new light, doesn't it?
Koola wrote:About NON-spoiler-attitude.... MasterWhedon: Can you make Grande Rojo remove his MAJOR Brokeback Mountain-spoiler in his KING KONG-review...?
mraig wrote:They should just get the computer program to write, direct, and star in the movie too. I am so fucking sick of seeing movies made with human input. Humans are imperfect and make mistakes. Computers are perfect and better than humans. They should also have computers watch the movies. Humans sometimes can't understand the plot, or miss subtle things that the director puts in the frame. Computers can be programmed to see everything.
I would say that probably the only bad thing about computers is that they were invented by humans, which gives them certain inherent flaws. We should have the computers invent a kind of computer. I bet that kind would be perfect, and would be even better at writing, directing, and starring in movies.
In closing, I would just like to say Yay for computers.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest