so sorry wrote:Is this whole thread/arguement about the fact that people form opinions about a director's new film they just saw in a biased way based on his previous body of work?
so sorry wrote:Is this whole thread/arguement about the fact that people form opinions about a director based on his previous body of work?
TonyWilson wrote:keep fighting the good fight against the mods, Pev, never falter, never doubt a new world is just around the corner if you hold on tight.
Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote: Are you voters crazy!?
If it was someone who had directed war epic sword and sandals films before, there'd be no nomination
King Of Nowhere wrote:Cpt Kirks 2pay wrote: Are you voters crazy!?
Because it's a well known fact that the Academy consists of the 15 or so zoners who still post, yeah?
Any questions about the oscars should be pointed somewhere else, as we can only give our opinions & not those of the union members that get to vote.
John-Locke wrote:
Case in point, I'm a huge Coen Bros fan... I was very underwhelmed by True Grit.
Hermanator X wrote:so sorry wrote:Is this whole thread/arguement about the fact that people form opinions about a director based on his previous body of work?
Apparently so. Thats why everyone ADORES the star wars prequels, Godfather 3, and kingdom of the crystal skull to name but a few.
caruso_stalker217 wrote:I'm not sure how bad I felt for Eduardo in this movie. I mean even without the settlement the guy still has more money than I'll ever see. I sympathize with him for getting screwed over by his friend, though. I think the money wasn't the big thing here. It was the dissolution of a friendship, etc.
Nachokoolaid wrote:I liked how the protagonist was a real asshole, which the audience is literally told in the first scene, but he was still somewhat likeable.
Spandau Belly wrote:Yeah, I don't really see how the Zuck character in this movie was just posing as a bastard to impress people. I think he really was a bastard. He spends the whole movie selfishly and cowardly stealing, lying, abusing, and betraying. I'm trying to think of one kind or charming thing he did during the entire movie that might show a kinder side of his character and I'm coming up blank.
Spandau Belly wrote:He spends the whole movie selfishly and cowardly stealing, lying, abusing, and betraying.
Spandau Belly wrote:I hope when they reboot this series they make Zuck a nicer character. I think the key would be anglicizing/translating his name. I mean, outside of Germany his name probably doesn't sound so friendly, but how could you hate a guy named Mark Sugarmountain?
so sorry wrote:Spandau Belly wrote:Yeah, I don't really see how the Zuck character in this movie was just posing as a bastard to impress people. I think he really was a bastard. He spends the whole movie selfishly and cowardly stealing, lying, abusing, and betraying. I'm trying to think of one kind or charming thing he did during the entire movie that might show a kinder side of his character and I'm coming up blank.
dickpedia entry
Matt Goldberg wrote:[With the upcoming release of his new film Gone Girl, I’m taking a look back at the work of director David Fincher. These articles contain spoilers.]
Read more at http://collider.com/tag/david-fincher/# ... PQ8cA35.99
TheButcher wrote:Mark Zuckerberg Calls 'The Social Network' "Hurtful", Cries Into Pillow Made Of $1000 Bills
The Facebook CEO also revealed why he wears a T-shirt made of gold doubloons every day
so sorry wrote:And isn't he a few years behind on this story? Who the hell cares at this point Mark?
Luke Skywalker wrote:I care!
TheBaxter wrote:so sorry wrote:And isn't he a few years behind on this story? Who the hell cares at this point Mark?Luke Skywalker wrote:I care!
Han Solo wrote:I know.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests